| Article |
|---|
| Article name |
Industrial economics in the context of globalization: scientific, practical foundations and development priorities |
| Authors |
|
| Bibliographic description |
|
| Category |
Economics |
| DOI |
338.012 |
| DOI |
10.21209/2227-9245-2021-27-5-117-125 |
| Article type |
|
| Annotation |
The relevance of the publication topic is argued by the need for an in-depth study of the globalization process, which is global financial, political and cultural integration, unification, the global division of labour, the planetary migration of capital, human and productive resources, standardization of legislation, and interference of cultures of the world community.
The theoretical and practical goals of the publication are to study causal algorithms for the formation of a negative scientific and production balance of the Russian Federation and an increase in disproportions between the import and export of high-tech products, as well as a comparative description of global development as a symbiosis of contradictory trends in the subordination of the world economy to the interests of transnational capital.
The theoretical and methodological basis of the publication was the scientific works of domestic and foreign scientists studying the globalization of the industrial economy due to the intensification of international scientific and technological competition and the expansion of the innovation market, deepening of specialization and division of labour, and the increase in the risks of producing high-tech products at the national and world levels. Scientific novelty lies in the authors’ interpretation of such socio-economic advantages of globalization as economies of scale, stimulation of labour productivity, rationalization of production at the interstate level and the spread of innovative technologies, cost reduction, price regression, achieving sustainable growth in the well-being of society, on the basis of which the development is confirmed global industrial economy on a research basis characterized by such attributes interdependence, asymmetry, regionalization and diversification, regression efficiency, inclusiveness, resource and raw material demarcation, a high degree of uncertainty and of the economic risk.
The practical significance of the results obtained is determined by an in-depth analysis of the American (based on differentiation of labor and specialization of personnel, demarcation of labor duties, concentration of scientific and production efforts on a purely economic result) and Eurasian (characterized by mobility and compactness of production processes, saving transaction costs, adaptability to market conditions and availability of labour-tolerant staff) strategies for innovative development of industrial economics. Based on a critical rethinking of the American and Eurasian strategies, proposals and recommendations are formulated on the formation of the scientific and technical policy of the Russian Federation |
| Key words |
economics; industry; globalization; international experience; innovations; science and practice; venture business; production and financial risk; entrepreneurship; labor productivity; American and Eurasian strategies for developing the industrial economy |
| Article information |
Krasovskaya I., Malysheva Т. Industrial economics in the context of globalization: scientific, practical foundations and development priorities // Transbaikal State University Journal, 2021, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 17–125. DOI: 10.21209/2227-9245-2021-27-5-117-125. |
| References |
1. Balashova Ye. S., Krasovskaya I. P., Malyshev Ye. A., Shamray F. A. Vestnik Zabaykal’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta (Bulletin of the Trans-Baikal State University), 2020, no. 3, vol. 26, pp. 80–89.
2. Vasil’yeva Ye. N. Problemy sovremennoy ekonomiki (Problems of modern economics), 2019, no. 2, pр. 104–112.
3. Kastel’s M. Informatsionnaya epokha: ekonomika, obshchestvo i kul’tura (Information age: economy, society and culture). Moscow.: Omega-L, 2017, 194 p.
4. Maksimov D. A. Natsional’nyye proyekty (National projects), 2017, no. 4.,рp. 71–75.
5. Porter M., Ketels K. Konkurentosposobnost’ na rasput’ye: napravleniya razvitiya rossiyskoy ekonomiki (Competitiveness at a crossroads: directions of development of the Russian economy). Moscow: Progress, 2016. 284 p.
6. Rikhter S. Innovatsii (Innovations), 2016, no. 3, рp. 12–19.
7. Schislyayeva Ye. R., Petrosyan A. A. Nauchno-tekhnicheskiye vedomosti SPbGPU. Ekonomicheskiye nauki (Scientific and technical statements of SPbSPU. Economic sciences), 2015, no. 1, рp. 261–264.
8. Adams А. Stanovlenie of a society of network structures (Becoming of a society of network structures). Washington: Publishing house of the technical literature, 2015, р. 226.
9. Berkowitz E., Kerin R., Rudelius W. Management (Management). Boston: Science. 2016. Р. 105.
10. Bread K. Industry in the USA (Industry in the USA), 2015, no. 2, рр. 44–49.
11. Brown N. Industry in the USA (Industry in the USA), 2016, no. 5, рр. 73–92.
12. Griffin T. International Management Communication (International Management Communication). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann LTD, 2018, рр. 317.
13. North D., North A. Economy of China: mentality, society, experience of the international cooperation (Economy of China: mentality, society, experience of the international cooperation). Boston: Science, 2017, 268 p.
14. Read I., Read R. Industry in the USA (Industry in the USA), 2015, no. 7, рр. 11–15.
|
| Full article | Industrial economics in the context of globalization: scientific, practical foundations and development priorities |
