Article
Article name State policy of artificial intelligence development in russia: an analysis of strategic goals
Authors
Bibliographic description
Category Politology
DOI 323(470):004.8
DOI 10.21209/2227-9245-2020-26-8-69-76
Article type
Annotation The state policy of artificial intelligence development in Russia is based on the national strategy approved in 2019 and valid until 2030. To understand the specifics of Russian policy, a national strategy was chosen as the object of research, and the subject of research was declared and latent strategic goals. The study is aimed at assessing the degree of correspondence between the strategic goals of state policy and modern concepts of artificial intelligence development. For the automatic analysis of the texts of the national strategy, similar foreign documents and the global array of publications, content analysis was used. The eight largest bibliographic databases have identified many original scientific articles on artificial intelligence. Content analysis of this array made it possible to identify six approaches (algorithmic, test, cognitive, landscape, explanatory and heuristic) to the construction of a concept for the development of artificial intelligence. The latter approach is the most end-to-end, allowing generalizing the rest of the approaches. Further analysis was carried out on the basis of a heuristic approach, within which the concepts of narrow, general and super intelligence are highlighted. The text of the national strategy was analyzed for compliance with the three concepts. It was found that the goals announced in the national strategy refer to the concept of artificial narrow intelligence. Analysis of the frequency of occurrence of terms in the strategy revealed latent goals (access to big data and software) that belong to the same concept. The study of the context of several cases of mentioning artificial general intelligence in the strategy only confirmed the general focus on the development of artificial narrow intelligence. The leading countries in the analyzed area are characterized by a strategic focus on the development of technologies for artificial general intelligence and scientific research on artificial superintelligence. The approximate time lag of the Russian strategy from the creation of artificial general intelligence has been determined. To overcome this lag and Russia occupy a leading position in the world, it was proposed to develop a new national strategy for the creation of artificial superintelligence technologies in the period up to 2050
Key words state policy; national strategy; development goal; latent meaning; content analysis; concept; artificial narrow intelligence; artificial general intelligence; artificial superintelligence; Russian Federation
Article information Blanutsa V. State policy of artificial intelligence development in russia: an analysis of strategic goals // Transbaikal State University Journal, 2020, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 69–76. DOI: 10.21209/2227-9245-2020-26-8-69-76.
References 1. Alekseev R. A. Zhurnal politicheskih issledovaniy (Journal of political research), 2020, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 58–69. 2. Komissina I. N. Problemy nacionalnoy strategii (Problems of national strategy), 2019, no. 1, pp. 137–160. 3. Lyubimov A. P., Ponomareva D. V., Barabashev A. G. Predstavitelnaya vlast – XXI vek: zakonodatelstvo, kommentarii, problemy (Representative power – XXI century: legislation, comments, problems), 2019, no. 5-6, pp. 1–7. 4. Skvortsov E. A., Krotov M. I., Skvortsova E. G., Beznosov G. A. Moskovskij ekonomicheskij zhurnal (Moscow economic journal), 2019, no. 9, pp. 211–218. 5. Artificial Intelligence Index: 2019 Annual Report (Artificial Intelligence Index: 2019 Annual Report). URL: https://hai.stanford.edu/sites/g/files/sbiybj10986/f/ai_index_2019_report.pdf (Date of access: 20.08.2020). Text: electronic. 6. Baum S. D., Barrett A. M., Yampolskiy R. V. Informatica – Journal of Computing and Informatics (Informatica – Journal of Computing and Informatics), 2017, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 419–427. 7. Bostrom N. Superintelligence: paths, dangers, strategies (Superintelligence: paths, dangers, strategies). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. 328 p. 8. Bradley P. AI & Society (AI & Society), 2020, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 319–328. 9. Cath C., Wachter S., Mittelstadt B., Taddeo M., Floridi L. Science and Engineering Ethics (Science and Engineering Ethics), 2018, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 505–528. 10. Chen W. Asia Pacific Issues (Asia Pacific Issues), 2019, no. 140, pp. 1–9. 11. Cristianini N. AI Communications (AI Communications), 2014, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 37–43. 12. Dambrot S. M. Procedia Computer Science (Procedia Computer Science), 2020, vol. 169, pp. 110–122. 13. Drisko J. M., Maschi T. Content analysis (Content analysis). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016. 191 p. 14. Fan J., Fang L., Wu J., Guo Y., Dai Q. Engineering (Engineering), 2020, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 248–252. 15. French R. M. Science (Science), 2012, vol. 336, no. 6078, pp. 164–165. 16. Fujii H., Managi S. Economic Analysis and Policy (Economic Analysis and Policy), 2018, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 60–69. 17. Grace K., Salvatier J., Dafoe A., Zhang B., Evans O. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research (Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research), 2018, vol. 62, pp. 729–754. 18. Li X., Fan M., Liang Z. International Journal of Technology Management (International Journal of Technology Management), 2020, vol. 82, no. 3-4, pp. 322–348. 19. Li Y., Tian M., Liu G., Peng C., Mao L. IEEE Access (IEEE Access), 2020, vol. 8, pp. 23568–23593. 20. Liu F., Shi Y. Annals of Data Science (Annals of Data Science), 2020, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 399–416. 21. López-Robles J. R., Otegi-Olaso J. R., Gómez I. P., Cobo M. J. International Journal of Information Management (International Journal of Information Management), 2019, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 22–38. 22. Lu Y. Journal of Management Analytics (Journal of Management Analytics), 2019, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–29. 23. Mayring P. Qualitative content analysis: theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution (Qualitative content analysis: theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution). Klagenfurt: SSOAR, 2014. 143 p. 24. Miller T. Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence), 2019, vol. 267, pp. 1–38. 25. Naude W., Dimitri N. The race for an artificial general intelligence: implications for public policy (The race for an artificial general intelligence: implications for public policy). Bonn: Institute of Labor Economics, 2018. 23 p. 26. Páez A. Minds and Machines (Minds and Machines), 2019, vol. 29, pp. 441–459. 27. Pessoa L. Physics of Life Reviews (Physics of Life Reviews), 2019, vol. 31, pp. 157–170. 28. Samoli S., Righi R., Cardona M., López-Cobo M., Vazquez-Prada Baillet M., De Prato G. AI watch TES analysis of AI worldwide ecosystem in 2009–2018 (AI watch TES analysis of AI worldwide ecosystem in 2009–2018). Luxemburg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2020. 68 p. 29. Shapshak P. Bioinformation (Bioinformation), 2018, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 38–41. 30. Shukla A. K., Janmaijaya M., Abraham A., Muhuri P. K. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence (Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence), 2019, vol. 85, pp. 517–532. 31. Skansi S. Guide to deep learning: logical, historical and philosophical perspectives (Guide to deep learning: logical, historical and philosophical perspectives). Cham: Springer, 2020. 140 p. 32. Sukhobokov A. A. Procedia Computer Science (Procedia Computer Science), 2018, vol. 145, pp. 533–544. 33. Tsihrintzis G. A., Jain L. C. Machine learning paradigms: advances in deep learning-based technological applications (Machine learning paradigms: advances in deep learning-based technological applications). Cham: Springer, 2020. 430 p. 34. Turchin A. Futures (Futures), 2019, vol. 107, pp. 45–58. 35. Wang P., Goertzel B. Theoretical foundation of artificial general intelligence (Theoretical foundation of artificial general intelligence). Amsterdam: Atlantis Press, 2012. 334 p.
Full articleState policy of artificial intelligence development in russia: an analysis of strategic goals