Article
Article name Conceptualization of social security of the region in the context of political regionalism and philosophical discourse
Authors
Bibliographic description
Category Politology
DOI 322 45
DOI 10.21209/2227-9245-2021-27-1-75-84
Article type
Annotation The article is devoted to the development of a social security model in the region, representing a comprehensive vision of various aspects of interaction between man and society on the way to preserve social security. The aim of the study is an attempt to synthesize the provisions of various scientific and socio-philosophical concepts of social security with the provisions of regional studies into a single systemic model of social security in the region. The implementation of this goal is carried out by the authors using a methodology based on a civilizational approach, which asserts the uniqueness of each of the regions, a systematic approach that reveals the social system of a region as a multi-core phenomenon in which various social levels are distinguished; a structuralist approach, which proves that social conditions for safe life depend on the development and organization of the social environment; semiotic approach aimed at analyzing the region as a spatial, locally distinguished social system formed around a complex of regional values; an instrumental approach that pays attention to the impact of mechanisms leading to the regional interests’ mobilization. The novelty of the presented research is associated with a model development of social security of the region based on the principle of complementarity of philosophical concepts of social security and the provisions of regional studies. The result of the study is a statement of the impossibility of covering this phenomenon in models developed in individual sciences that form scattered images of the social security of the region, but do not cover the entirety of this phenomenon. The second result of the study is the formation of a social security model of the region, which allows taking into account civilizational, systemic, structural, value, instrumentally constructed parameters. The third result is the proof of the possibility of building a social security system based on values, the mobilization of which takes place within the framework of a dialogue between external and intra-regional social discourses
Key words social security model; social security; security concepts; civilizational approach; systems approach; structuralist approach; social system of the region; life safety; social environment; regional interests
Article information Romanova N., Kononov S., Shevchenko М., Shevchenko Yu. Conceptualization of social security of the region in the context of political regionalism and philosophical discourse // Transbaikal State University Journal, 2021, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 75–84. DOI: 10.21209/2227-9245-2021-27-1-75-84.
References 1. Assman Yan. Kulturnaya pamyat. Pisimo, pamyat o proshlom i politicheskaya identichnost v vysokih kulturah drevnosti (Cultural memory. Writing, memory of the past and political identity in high cultures of antiquity). Moscow: Languages of Slavic Culture, 2004. 368 p. 2. Bibler V. S. Ot naukoucheniya – k logike kultury. Dva filosofskih vvedeniya v dvadtsat pervy vek: monografiya (From science to the logic of culture. Two philosophical introductions to the twenty-first century: monograph). Moscow: Politizdat, 1991. 413 p. 3. Zhukov A. V., Zhukova A. A. Vestnik Zabaykalskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta (Bulletin of the Transbaikal State University), 2014, no. 1, р. 120–128. 4. Zhukov A. V., Zhukova A. A. Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kulturologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki (Historical, philosophical, political and legal sciences, cultural studies and art history. Questions of theory and practice), 2014, no. 3-4, рp. 54–68. 5. Zhukov A. V. Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kulturologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki (Historical, philosophical, political and legal sciences, cultural studies and art history. Questions of theory and practice), 2017, no. 12-4. S. 66–71. 6. Zhukov A. V. Vestnik Chitinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta (Bulletin of the Chita State University), 2010, no. 2. рр. 129–136. 7. Zhukov A. V., Zhukova A. A., Vlasova K. E. Izvestiya Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta (Proceedings of the Irkutsk State University), 2015, vol. 11, рр. 87–96. 8. Zhukov A. V. Vestnik Chitinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta (Bulletin of the Chita State University), 2011, no. 2, рр. 10–15. 9. Zhukov A. V., Zhukova A. A. Kontsept: filosofiya, religiya, kultura (Concept: philosophy, religion, culture), 2018, no.1, 2018. № 1, рр. 44–51. 10. Karmadonov O. A., Kovrigina G. D. Vestnik instituta sotsiologii (Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology), 2016, no. 17, рр. 13–26. 11. Klyueva E. A. Obshchestvo. Sreda. Razvitie (Society. Wednesday. Development), 2015. no. 4, рр. 43–46. 12. Levashov V. K. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya (Sociological researches), 2017, no. 7, рр. 32–46. 13. Litvinov E. P. Elektronnoe nauchnoe izdanie Almanah Prostranstvo i vremya (Electronic scientific publication Almanac Space and Time), 2014, vol. 7, no. 1, рр. 2. 14. Marx K. Marks K. Engels F. Sochineniya (Marx K. Engels F. Works. Moscow: Polit. lit. Publishing House, 1974, vol. 42, pp. 41–174. 15. Mikhaylenko A. N., Skaldutsky S. V. Vlast istorii i istoriya vlasti (The power of history and the history of power), 2017, vol. 3, no. 4. pp. 491–515. 16. Polutin S. V. Razvitie sotsialnogo prostranstva Rossii: novye vyzovy i perspektivy (Development of the Russian social space: new challenges and prospects), 2018, рр. 47–51. 17. Stepin V. S. Dialog kultur i partnerstvo tsivilizatsiy: stanovlenie globalnoy kultury (Dialogue of cultures and partnership of civilizations: formation of a Global culture). St. Petersburg: SPbGUP, 2010, vol. 2, pp. 71–92. 18. Khantington S. Stolknovenie tsivilizatsiy (The Clash of Civilizations). Moscow: AST, 2016, 640 p. 19. Chellen R. Gosudarstvo kak forma zhizni (The State as a form of life). Moscow: ROSSPAN, 2008, 319 p. 20. Buzan B., Waver O. Regions and Powers (Regions and Powers). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003, 564 p. 21. Fawcett L. Interregionalism and the European Union. Post-revisionist Approach to Europe’s Place in a Changing World (Interregionalism and the European Union. Post-revisionist Approach to Europe’s Place in a Changing World). Abington: Routledge, 2016, рp. 33–55. 22. Jones M., Jones R., Woods M. An introduction to political geography: Space, place and politics (An introduction to political geography: Space, place and politics). N.Y.: Routledge, 2004, 202 p. 23. Kissinger H. World Order (World Order). NY: Penguin books, 2015, 420 p. 24. Nyman J. Review of International Studies (Review of International Studies), 2016, no. 42, рp. 521–839. 25. Zhukov A., Bernyikevich T. MATEC Web of Conferences. electronic edition (MATEC Web of Conferences. electronic edition), 2018, рр. 10003. 26. Zhukov A. V. State, Religion and Church in Russia and Worldwide\\ (State, Religion and Church in Russia and Worldwide), 2010, vol. 28, no. 1, рр. 165–172.
Full articleConceptualization of social security of the region in the context of political regionalism and philosophical discourse