| Annotation |
The article analyzes the research methodology of the problem of religious threats, aiming to identify their specificity in comparison with other threats to state and public security. Methodology is presented by a phenomenological approach, comparative approach, historical approach, comprehensive approach, determination of the study course, which consists not in exposing the threat to the public manifestations of religion, but in the development of the theory of social adaptation of religion. The authors prove that emerging religion by trying to spread its influence in society causes a negative reaction. This reaction compels them to make efforts, on the one hand it aims to protect their rights, on the other – aimed at the transformation of the original own institutional, ideological and strategic installations, that is at the process of adaptation to the society that originally has been rejected by them.
As a result of such interaction, religious associations initially persecuted in society form an atmosphere of tolerance around them and become equal participants in social discourse. It is important that this process, which generates new players within the social space, affects traditional religions, which are forced either to squeeze in the market of spirituality, or, like its competitors, to transform their social policy
|
| References |
1. Astehr I. V., Kuchukova N. Yu., Serov N. V. Sovremennye issledovaniya sotsialnyh problem (Modern research of social problems), 2012, no. 2, рp. 1–14.
2. Belsky A. I. Vestnik Belgorodskogo yuridicheskog oinstituta MVD Rossii (Bulletin of the Belgorod law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia), 2013, no. 2, рp. 67–69.
3. Bushueva E. S., Zhukov A. V. Sotsiokulturnaya sreda Zabaykaliya: spetsifika formirovaniya (Socio-cultural environment of the Transbaikal region: specific features of formation). Chita: ZaBGU, 2012, 170 p.
4. Dialogi: polemicheskie stati o vozmozhnyh posledstviyah razvitiya sovremennoy nauki (Dialogues: polemic articles on possible consequences of the modern science development) / comp. A. M. Lepikhov, O. P. Moroz. Mosсоw: State publishing house polit. literature, 1979, р. 61.
5. Dobrenkov V. I., Radugin A. A. Metodologicheskie voprosy issledovaniya religii: monografiya (Methodological issues of religion research: monograph). Moscow: Higher school, 1989, р. 178.
6. Zhukov A. V. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskienauki, kulturologiya i iskusstvovedenie (Questions of theory and practice. Historical, philosophical, political and legal Sciences, cultural studies and art history), 2017, no. 12, рart 4, рp. 66–71.
7. Zhukov A. V. Religioznoe mifotvorchestvo v obydennoy religioznosti naseleniya Baykalskogo regiona: avtoreferat dis. d-ra filos. nauk: 09.00.14 (Religious myth-making in the everyday religiosity of the population of the Baikal region: abstract of the doctor of philos. sciences: 09.00.14). Chita, 2011. 45 p.
8. Zhukov A. V. Vestnik Chitinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta (Bulletin of the Chita State University), 2010, no. 2, р. 129–136.
9. Zhukov A. V. Vestnik Chitinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta (Bulletin of the Chita State University), 2010, no. 3, рр. 27–33.
10. Zhukov A. V., Zhukova A. A. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kulturologiya i iskusstvovedenie (Questions of theory and practice. Historical, philosophical, political and legal Sciences, cultural studies and art history), 2014, no. 3-1, рp. 54–58.
11. Zagrebina I. V. Vestnik Privolzhskoy akademii gosudarstvennoy sluzhby (Bulletin of the Volga Academy of Public Service). 2010, no. 3, рp. 73–77.
12. Luman N. Vlast (Power). Moscow: Praxis, 2001, р. 52.
13. Prokudina N. V. Magistra Vitae: zhurnal po istoricheskim naukam i arkheologii (Magistra Vitae: Historical Sciences and Archeology Journal), 2017, no. 1, рp. 75–82.
14. Romanova N. P. Vestnik Chitinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta (Bulletin of the Chita State University), 2009, no. 4, рр. 212–217.
15. Romanova N. P., Zhukova A. A. Vestnik Zabaykalskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta (Bulletin of the Transbaikal State University), 2012, no. 2, рр. 119–124.
16. Romanova N. P. Vestnik Chitinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta (Bulletin of the Chita State University), 2008, no. 4, рр. 140–152.
17. Ruzevich O. R. Yuridicheskaya tekhnika (Legal technique), 2015, no. 9, рp. 644-650.
18. Svetskiy E. V. Publichnoe i chastnoe pravo (Public and private law), 2014, no. 4, рp. 68–87.
19. Slobozhnikova V. S. Vestnik Saratovskoy gosudarstvennoy yuridicheskoy akademii (Bulletin of the Saratov State Law Academy), 2019, no. 6, рp. 255–261.
20. Tarasevich I. A. Konstitutsionno-pravovye osnovy religioznoy bezopasnosti Rossiyskoy Federatsii: dis. …. d-ra yurid. nauk: 12.00.02 (Constitutional and legal bases of religious security of the Russian Federation: dis. ... doctor of law: 12.00.02). Tyumen, 2015, 376 p.
21. Shleyermakher F. Rechi o religii. Monologi (Speeches about religion. Monologues). Saint Petersburg: Aleteya, 1994, 432 p.
22. Yavorskiy M.A. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava (Journal of Russian Law), 2007, no. 7, рp. 10–13.
23. Zhukov A., Bernyukevich T., Zakharova E., Gomboeva M. Indian Journal of Science and Technology (Indian Journal of Science and Technology), 2016, vol. 9, no. 42, pp. 104-239.
24. Zhukov A., Zhukova A. IEJME: Mathematics Education (IEJME: Mathematics Education), 2016, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 1321–1330.
|
