Article
Article name Magnetic survey – ground technology, aeromagnetic survey on aircraft and unmanned aerial vehicles: a comparative analysis of the results (on the example of Eastern Transbaikalia)
Authors Gruzdev R.. ,
Bibliographic description
Category Earth science
DOI 553.3 (571.55)
DOI 10.21209/2227-9245-2020-26-8-6-15
Article type
Annotation The use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) in geophysical work is becoming a very popular area in the field of modern geological exploration. The advantage of unmanned systems is the optimal ratio of the quality of research results with a significant increase in work productivity and a decrease in cost. In this regard, the improvement of field techniques and the processing of UAV materials is of particular interest for exploration. On the subject, there are a number of unresolved issues that have been revealed to some extent as a result of the author’s comparison of ground-based magnetic exploration and aeromagnetic survey data. The purpose of the study was to assess the possibility of a full-fledged replacement of ground magnetic exploration work for aeromagnetic survey using unmanned aerial vehicles. The comparison of different types of magnetic survey is relevant, since on the basis of the actual material, the possibility of using an alternative more productive method – aeromagnetic survey using modern UAVs – instead of traditional expensive ground-based magnetic exploration works is analyzed. To compare the results of the studies, actual material obtained from field work on an area of 13,4 km2 was used. Based on the databases, maps of anomalous magnetic field and graphs on several geophysical profiles are built. Results of magnetic survey in air and ground versions are analyzed; correlation relationships between data of ground pedestrian magnetic survey and aeromagnetic system on An-3 and UAV aircraft are established. Based on the results of the study, correlation and determination coefficients were obtained, which indicate that geophysical methods on UAVs adequately occupy their place between classical aerogeophysics and ground-based pedestrian survey. Moreover, aeromagnetic survey using UAVs is able to replace pedestrian magnetic exploration during work at the same heights. Based on the results of the study, methodological recommendations for the production of aeromagnetic survey on UAVs were compiled
Key words unmanned aerial vehicle; aeromagnetic survey; correlation; magnetic field; anomaly; regression analysis; observation network; vertical derivative; gradient zones; flight altitude
Article information Gruzdev R. Magnetic survey – ground technology, aeromagnetic survey on aircraft and unmanned aerial vehicles: a comparative analysis of the results (on the example of Eastern Transbaikalia) // Transbaikal State University Journal, 2020, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 6–15. DOI: 10.21209/2227-9245-2020-26-8-6-15.
References 1. Geoskan 401 Geofizika (Geoscan 401 Geophysics). URL: https://www.geoscan.aero/ru (Date of access: 25.09.2020). Text: electronic. 2. Goglev D. A. Geoprofi (Geoprofi), 2018, no. 6, pp. 20–22. 3. Kovrizhnykh P. N., Kozhamsugirov D. O., Kozhevnikov S. N., Makarov D. V., Kapshtan D. Ya. Geologiya i okhrana nedr (Geology and protection subsoil), 2017, no. 4, pp. 34–42. 4. Geoken (Geoken). URL: https://geoken.com/portfolio/magnetic-surveys (Date of access: 25.09.2020). Text: electronic. 5. Parshin A. V., Tsirel V. S., Antsev V. G. Geofizika (Geofizika), 2017, no. 8, pp. 33–39. 6. Semenova M. P., Tsirel V. S. Razvedka i okhrana nedr (Exploration and conservation of mineral resources), 2016, no. 8, pp. 34–39. 7. Firsov A. P., Zlygostev I. N., Dyadkov P. G., Savluk A. V., Vaysman P. A., Vald A. K., Sheremet A. S., Evmenov N. D. Nedropolzovaniye. Gornoye delo. Napravleniya i tehnologii poiska, razvedki i razrabotki mestorozhdeniy poleznyh iskopayemyh. Geoekologiya: sb. st. (Subsurface use. Mining. Directions and technologies of prospecting, exploration and development of mineral deposits. Geoecology: collected articles). Novosibirsk: SGUGiT, 2015, vol. 2, pp. 299–304. 8. Firsov A. P., Zlygostev I. N., Savluk A. V., Popadyuk I. F., Epov M. I., Vasilevsky A. N. Effektivnost geologorazvedochnyh rabot na almazy: prognozno-resursnyye, metodicheskiye, innovatsionno-tehnologicheskiye puti yeye povysheniya: sb. st. (The effectiveness of geological exploration for diamonds: predictive resource, methodological, innovative and technological ways to improve it: collected articles). Mirny, 2018, pp. 325–330. 9. Cunningham M. Aeromagnetic surveying with unmanned aircraft systems (Aeromagnetic surveying with unmanned aircraft systems). URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/291345900_Aeromagnetic_surveying_with_unmanned_aircraft_systems (Date of access: 25.09.2020). Text: electronic. 10. Parshin A. V., Kanaikin V. S., Blinov A. V., Mikhalev A. O. Cost-saving low-altitude UAV magnetic survey technology and its GIS software (Cost-saving low-altitude UAV magnetic survey technology and its GIS software). URL: http://earthdoc.eage.org/publication/publicationdetails/?publication=84648 (Date of access: 12.09.2020). Text: electronic.
Full articleMagnetic survey – ground technology, aeromagnetic survey on aircraft and unmanned aerial vehicles: a comparative analysis of the results (on the example of Eastern Transbaikalia)