Article
Article name To the question of interbudgetary relations of municipalities in the region
Authors Sharaldaev B.. ,
Bulakh E.. ,
Sharaldaeva A.. ,
Vasilieva T.. ,
Bibliographic description
Category Economics
DOI 336.143(571.54)
DOI 10.21209/2227-9245-2020-26-5-118-125
Article type
Annotation The study of the issue of inter-budget relations of the subject of the Russian Federation, municipalities (Municipalities), both the district and rural settlements (SP) remains relevant even after a fairly long time. It should be noted that for the period of more than twenty years of the Federal Law “On the General Principles of the Organization of Local Self-Government in the Russian Federation”, we are constantly observing changes and additions to this law, and such an approach to improving the law directly affects all areas and structures of local self-government bodies (LSG) at the level of Moscow region and joint venture. Undoubtedly in this situation, the most important issue in the activity of the local self-government is the inter-budget relations of the Russian Federation, the constituent entity of the Russian Federation and the Moscow Region. It should be noted that with the implementation of Federal Law No. 131 of October 6, 2003, the established system of managing an administrative-territorial unit at the level of territorial formation as a district was completely violated. For example, if, according to the old Federal Law, the head of the village council was directly appointed and subordinate to the head of the district and the head of the district was fully responsible for all questions, problems and the socio-economic situation of the region to the regional authorities. In addition, it was much easier to carry out the district, regional and state socio-economic policies, and it should be noted that during this period of the “old” law there was no confrontation and negative struggle between the head of the district and the head of the joint venture, which in itself negatively affected the socio-economic development of the regional territorial system. Thus, such problematic issues as the local budget, social issues, the transfer of authority and responsibility within the district require a clear definition in the management of not only the district, but also the joint venture, as well as the most important criterion in the management system of the district’s municipality is a unified method of organizing inter-budgetary relationship. In addition, it is necessary, on a legislative basis, to return to the “old” management system of the region’s municipalities; this approach to district management will strengthen the overall socio-economic development of the region
Key words intergovernmental relations; municipality; district; rural settlements; management; budget; powers; region
Article information Sharaldaev B., Bulakh E., Sharaldaeva A., Vasilieva T. To the question of interbudgetary relations of municipalities in the region // Transbaikal State University Journal, 2020, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 118–125. DOI: 10.21209/2227-9245-2020-26-5-118-125.
References 1. Batuev Ts. B. Vestnik Vostochno-Sibirskogo gosudarstvennogo tehnologicheskogo universiteta (Bulletin of the East Siberian State Technological University), 2011, no. 2, pp. 172–176. 2. Burlov D. Yu., Rabdanova D. B. Ekonomicheskiy vestnik Vostochno-Sibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta tehnologiy i upravleniya (Economic Bulletin of the East Siberian State University of Technology and Management), 2018, no. 5, pp. 39–47. 3. Finansy (Finance), 2013, no. 8, pp. 5–9. 4. Vasyunina M. L., Grinevich M. V. Munitsipalnaya akademiya (Municipal Academy), 2019, no. 1, pp. 80–85. 5. Gryazev A. A. Pravovoye regulirovaniya vzaimootnosheniy organov gosudarstvennoy vlasti i mestnogo samoupravleniya v finansovoy sfere (Legal regulation of relations between public authorities and local self-government in the financial sector). Chelyabinsk: Recpol, 2010. 140 p. 6. Zakharchuk E. A., Nekrasov A. A., Pasynkov A. F. Finansy: teoriya i praktika (Finance: theory and practice), 2019, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 122–132. 7. Ivanov A. I. Finansy (Finance), 2002, no. 12, pp. 16–19. 8. Mokry V. S. Finansy (Finance), 2001, no. 6, pp. 3–7. 9. Rzhevskaya T. G. Finansovaya sistema i proportsionalnost rossiyskogo byudzheta (teoriya i praktika formirovaniya byudzhetnykh proportsiy) (The financial system and the proportionality of the Russian budget (theory and practice of forming budget proportions)). Moscow: UNITI, 2008. 159 p. 10. Yakovleva I. A., Zhalsaraeva E. A. Vestnik Vostochno-Sibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta tehnologiy i upravleniya (Bulletin of the East Siberian State University of Technology and Management), 2015, no. 3, pp. 116–123. 11. McConnell C. R., Brue S. L. Economics: principles, problems, and policies (Economics: principles, problems, and policies). New York, 1990. 716 p. 12. Stiglitz J. E. Economics of the public sector (Economics of the public sector). New York; London: W. W. Norton & Company, 2000. 848 р.
Full articleTo the question of interbudgetary relations of municipalities in the region