| Annotation |
The uneven socio-economic development of the country’s subjects and individual territories is due to the influence of factors at different levels, depending on the state of larger economic systems. In Russia, there are municipal units with stable negative dynamics of socio-economic indicators. Assessment and analysis of the state of the resource base of such territories will help to identify promising areas for optimizing the use of resources for the development of those activities that are potentially capable of generating income. The practice of economic strategic planning is currently focused on a program-oriented approach and the inclusion of territories with complex socio-economic situation in higher-order network structures to participate in the redistribution of income from the use of available resources. The consistency of the policy is reflected in the complexity of measures, the relationship of economic, managerial and marketing mechanisms for the implementation of state and regional programs for the development of territories.
The purpose of the article is to identify promising areas for the use of natural resources and the geographical location of territories with resort and recreational potential for improving socio-economic indicators.
Research methods are the following: structural analysis, modeling of socio-economic processes, elements of business planning.
The article analyzes the theoretical concepts related to the degradation of the economy of municipal territorial entities. The article considers the territory of the Perm region that has natural medical resources that can potentially be widely used in various types of commercial activities, including in the medical and Wellness process.
Recommendations for the use of natural healing resources in the development of resort and recreational activities of the territory are given
|
| References |
1. Bylov G. V., Smirnyagin L. V. Federalizm i regionalnaya politika: problemy Rossii i zarubezhnyy opyt. Vyp. 3 (Federalism and regional policy: problems of Russia and foreign experience. Vol. 3) / ed. V. E. Seliverstova. Novosibirsk: ECOR, 1996, pp. 19–33.
2. Leksin V. N., Shvetsov A. N. Gosudarstvo i regiony. Teoriya i praktika gosudarstvennogo regulirovaniya territorialnogo razvitiya (State and regions. Theory and practice of state regulation of territorial development). Moscow: URSS, 1997. 372 p.
3. Lapin A. V., Kutergina G. V. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika (Bulletin of the Perm University. Series: Economics), 2016, no. 1, pp. 98−109.
4. Nizhegorodtsev R. M., Berulava A. G. RISK: resursy, informatsiya, snabzheniye, konkurentsiya (RISC: resources, information, supply, competition), 2014, no. 1, pp. 167−170.
5. Ukolova M. A. Metodicheskiye podkhody k opredeleniyu stepeni depressivnosti gorodskikh territoriy: avtoref. dis. … kand. ekon. nauk: 08.00.05 (Methodological approaches to determining the degree of urban areas’ depressiveness: abstract dis. ... candidate of economic sciences: 08.00.05). Irkutsk, 2005. 24 p.
6. Shtulberg B. M. O depressivnykh regionakh v Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Puti vykhoda iz krizisa: materialy k parlamentskim slushaniyam 15 aprelya 1997 g. (About depressed regions in the Russian Federation. Ways to overcome the crisis: materials for the parliamentary hearings on April 15, 1997). Moscow: SOPS, 1997, pp. 3−5.
7. Akpinar R., Taşçi K., Özsan M. Growth and Change (Growth and Change), 2015, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 337–349.
8. De Marchi V., Grandinetti R. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie (Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie), 2017, vol. 108, no. 2, pp. 234–249.
9. Hryhoruk P., Khrushch N. Marketing and management of innovations (Marketing and management of innovations), 2016, vol. 3, pp. 109–129.
10. Prokop V., Stejskal J. Engineering Economics (Engineering Economics), 2017, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 47–55.
11. Schmidt S., Balestrin A. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation (Journal of Technology Management & Innovation), 2015, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 32–43.
|
