| Annotation |
Based on the analysis of the newest original specialized German-speaking sources that have not been translated into Russian before (which allows introducing factual material into Russian science), the authors presented the institutional features of modern German policy in the area of scientific ethics on the example of ombuds-men (interregional and local) in science. The current state of the German experience in dealing with violations of scientific ethics is characterized and its advantages that could be adopted in the conditions of modern Russia are indicated. Through the gen-eral scientific methods of knowledge, traditionally used in the humanities (analysis, synthesis, synthesis and systematization of scientific information and factual material), the authors used comparative legal, comparative historical and formal legal methods, system and structural-functional analysis, methods of expert assessments and ob-servation. Issues relating to the essence of the ombudsman institution introduced in 1999 were considered. The main directions and main principles of activity of the German interregional and local ombudsmen for science are described. Their role in ensuring good scientific practice is noted. It was concluded that the experience of Germany in combating violations of scientific ethics can be adopted in the process of modernizing the national system of training scientific and pedagogical personnel, ac-cording to the changing realities and integration of Russia into the international (pri-marily European) scientific and educational space |
| Article information |
Antropov R., Antropova N., Firsov O., Smolich K. The policy of Germany in the field of ob-serving scientific ethics: institutional features (on the example of ombudsmen activity in the field of science) // Transbaikal State University Journal, 2018, vol. 24, no. 9, pp.46-55 |
| References |
References
1. Abramov E. G., Kirillova O. V. Nauchnaya periodika: problemy i resheniya (Scientific periodicals: problems and solutions), 2012, no. 5, pp. 4–8.
2. Avdeeva N. V., Nikulina O. V. Kachestvo obrazovaniya (The quality of educa-tion), 2014, no. 6, pp. 16–20.
3. V Germanii ombudsmeny sledyat za soblyudeniem nauchnoy etiki (In Ger-many, ombudsmen monitor the observance of scientific ethics). Available at: http://www.dw.com/en/in- Germany- ombudsmen-follow-up- in compliance with the scientific- ethics (Date of access: 10.04.2018).
4. Duel A. V dissertatsiyah po istorii nashli plagiat (In dissertations on the history plagiarism was found). Available at: https: www// rg.ru/2013/09/04/dissertacii-site-anons.html (Date of access: 17.04.2018).
5. Itogovy doklad Komissii Minobrnauki Rossii po provedeniyu ekspertnoy otsenki dissertatsiy na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni kandidata nauk, doktora nauk, zashchishchennyh v sovete D212.154.01 (The final report of the Commission of the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia on the expert assessment of dissertations for the degree of Ph.D., Doctor of Science, defended in the dissertation board D212.154.01). Available at: https: //www.minobrnauki.rf/news/3029 (Date of access: 20.04.2018).
6. Kotlyar P. 300 «musornym» zhurnalam ukazali na mesto (300 \"junk\" maga-zines were pointed to the place). Available at: https://www.gazeta.ru/science/2017/04/19_a_10634891.shtml (Date of access: 20.05.2018).
7. Matskevich I. M. Yuridicheskoe obrazovanie i nauka (Legal education and sci-ence), 2017, no. 7, pp. 3–9.
8. Nemetskie politiki, ulichennye v plagiate (German politicians convicted of pla-giarism). Available at: https://www.dw.com/ru/nemetskie- politicians- found-in-plagiariate / g-35961754 (Date of access: 18.06.2018).
9. Platonova E. N., Sadovaya I. N. Nauchny vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo arhitekturno-stroitelnogo universiteta. Ser. Sotsialno-gumanitarnye nauki (Scientific Bulletin of the Voronezh State University of Archi-tecture and Civil Engineering. Ser. Social and Human Sciences), 2016, no. 2, pp. 94–100.
10. Romanov V. G. Vestnik Zabaykal. gos. un-ta (Transbaikal State University Journal), 2015, no. 10, pp. 147–150.
11. Sevostyanov D. A. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii (Higher education in Russia), 2017, no. 3, pp. 17–25.
12. Chekhovich Yu. V. Nauchnaya periodika: problemy i resheniya (Scientific pe-riodicals: problems and solutions), 2013, no. 4, pp. 22–25.
13. Das Ombudsgremium (Das ombudsgremium). Available at: http://www.ombudsman-fuer-die-wissenschaft.de/das-ombudsgremium/ (Date of ac-cess: 17.07.2018).
14. Grottke M., Braun E., Großmann S. Plagiatserkennung, plagiatsvermeidung und plagiatssanktionierung: interdisziplinäre lösungsansätze für die korrekturpraxis an universitäten und fachhochschulen (transparenz in der wirtschaft) (Plagiatserkennung, plagiatsvermeidung und plagiatssanktionierung: interdisziplinäre lösungsansätze für die korrekturpraxis an universitäten und fachhochschulen (transparenz in der wirtschaft)). Lohmar: Eul, J. Verlag, 2012.
15. Horstkotte H. Ein Professor und sein Schreibknecht (Ein professor und sein schreibknecht). Available at: http://www.spiegel.de/lebenundlernen/job/plagiate-ein-professor-und-sein-schreibknecht (Date of access: 01.04.2018).
16. Jahresbericht 2016 an den Senat der DFG und die Öffentlichkeit (Jahresbericht 2016 an den Senat der DFG und die Öffentlichkeit). Available at: http: // www. ombudsman-fuer-die-wissenschaft.de (Date of access: 21.05.2018).
17. Lahusen Ch., Markschies Ch. Zitat, paraphrase, plagiat: wissenschaft zwischen guter praxis und fehlverhalten (Zitat, paraphrase, plagiat: wissenschaft zwischen guter praxis und fehlverhalten). Frankfurt: Campus Verlag, 2015. 339 p.
18. Liste der ombudspersonen an deutschen hochschulen und forschungseinrichtungen (Liste der ombudspersonen an deutschen hochschulen und forschungseinrichtungen). Available at: http://www.ombudsman-fuer-die-wissenschaft.de (Date of access: 25.06.2018).
19. Rieble V. Das wissenschaftsplagiat: vom versagen eines systems (Das wissenschaftsplagiat: vom versagen eines systems). Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann Verlag, 2010. 120 p.
20. Sicherung der guten wissenschaftlichen praxis. Empfehlungen der kommission ”Selbstkontrolle in der Wissenschaft” (Sicherung der guten wissenschaftlichen praxis. Empfehlungen der kommission ”Selbstkontrolle in der Wissenschaft”): Denkschrift. Ergänzte Aufl. Weinheim: Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 2013. 112 p. Available at: http://www.dfg.de/download/pdf/dfg_im_profil/reden_stellungnahmen/download/empfehlung_wiss_praxis_1310.pdf (Date of access: 17.03.2018).
21. Weber-Wulff D., Wohnsdorf G. Information. Wissenschaft & Praxis (Infor-mation. Wissenschaft & Praxis), 2006, no. 57, pp. 90–98.
|
