Article
Article name An Interdisciplinary Approach as a Methodological Basis for Studying the Discourse of Political Identity in Dissertation Research by Russian Scientists
Authors Matveeva E. . doctor of political sciences, associate professor, professor, mev.matveeva2020@yandex.ru
Bibliographic description Matveeva E. V. An interdisciplinary approach as a methodological basis for studying the discourse of political identity in dissertation research by Russian scientists // Transbaikal State University Journal. 2025. Vol. 31, no. 4. P. 95–104. DOI: 10.21209/2227-9245-2025-31-4-95-104
Category Politology
DOI 323
DOI 10.21209/2227-9245-2025-31-4-95-104
Article type Original article
Annotation The relevance of this article is determined by the national priority of the Russian Federation, expressed by the strategic objective of preserving and strengthening traditional values, with a special place given to the Russian identity formation. The article demonstrates that identity politics implemented by the state and issues of of state political decisions is determined by the degree of support and approval from the population. The object of this study is the discourse of political identity, reflected in the dissertations of Russian scholars. The subject of the research is the analysis of semantic narratives in the form of discourses of political identity, presented in dissertation research of Russian scientists, primarily in the specialty of political science. The aim of the article is to identify individual semantic narratives in the form of discourses in the texts of dissertations from 2021–2025, which influence the practical results of understanding issues of political identity at the regional (national) level. To achieve this goal, the following objectives have been defined: to substantiate the author’s research methodology associated with the use of an interdisciplinary approach as the main methodological basis in the study of political phenomena; to conduct a review of scientific publications in recent years on the problem of political identity and identify the main methodological solutions for understanding this phenomenon; to identify semantic narratives in the texts of dissertations united by the topic of political identity. The article’s methodology is based on the synthesis of theories of political discourse (E. Laclau, Ch. Mouffe) and the concept of an interdisciplinary approach as a basis for constructing modern political reality. The author comes to the conclusion that the manifestations of political identity (national, regional, local) considered in dissertation studies influence the stability of the regional system of power and the state as a whole in the long-term period of development. Based on the study of semantic narratives, it has been established that underestimation of manifestations of political identity in modern politics is fraught with aggravation of national and ethnic contradictions in the regions.
Key words identity, political identity, identity politics, discourse analysis, political identity discourse, semantic narratives, theories of political discourse by E. Laclau and Ch. Mouffe, interdisciplinarity theory, dissertation research on political identity, political science
Article information
References 1. Gaman-Golutvina OV. Overcoming methodological differences: the debate about knowledge politics in an age of uncertainty. Polis. Political Studies. 2019;(5):19-42. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2019.05.03. EDN: VCXQCS. (In Russian) 2. Zborovsky GE. Pluralism of methodological approaches as a problem of scientific research. Izvestia Ural Federal University Journal. Series 1: Issues in Education, Science and Culture. 2015;141(3):6-15. EDN: UNVRMB. (In Russian) 3. Zulyar RYu, Serebryakov EA. State youth policy as an object of the research (following thesis works). The Bulletin of Irkutsk State University. Series: Political Science and Religion Studies. 2014;9:210-214. EDN: SYLDIZ. (In Russian) 4. Zyryanov VV. Doctoral dissertations in sociology in 2012–2022 in Russia: statistics, analytics. Sociological Research. 2023;(9):78-88. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250027779-9. EDN: JFEBXQ. (In Russian) 5. Semmenenko IS (ed). Identity: Personality, Society, Politics. New Contours of the Research Field. Moscow: Ves’ Mir; 2023. 512 p. (In Russian) 6. Kabaziev MSh. Political identity in the context of identity politics in modern Kazakhstan: features, problems, trends: cand. polit. sci. diss. Yekaterinburg; 2023. 187 p. EDN: CSNCRM. (In Russian) 7. Makarova TS. Representation of the Concept of «Irish Political Identity» in 19th-Century Historical Discourse: cand. philol. sci. diss. Perm; 2021. 165 p. EDN: CXTDEW. (In Russian) 8. Popova OV. Development of researches of political identity in the Russian political science. Political Expertise: Politex. 2013;9(2):205-219. EDN: PZADRV. (In Russian) 9. Rostovskaya TK, Fomina OE. Analyzing dissertation research in sociology of 2012-2022 period. Management Issues. 2023;17(5):67-81. DOI: 10.22394/2304-3369-2023-5-67-81. EDN: JTOHFI. (In Russian) 10. Rusiya NT. Identity politics at the local level: institutions, processes and technologies: cand. polit. sci. diss. Krasnodar; 2024. 209 p. EDN: SVBPWX. (In Russian) 11. Semmenenko IS. Political identity and identity politics. Political Expertise: Politex. 2011;7(2):5-24. EDN: ONHDON. (In Russian) 12. Sosnovskaya AM. The Politics of Urban Identity in the Discourse of Cultural Heritage: dr. polit. sci. diss. Saint Petersburg; 2023. 384 p. 13. Smorgunov LV. The problem of methodological synthesis in contemporary comparative politics. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. International Relations. 2011;(1):76-85. EDN: NPFTLV. (In Russian) 14. Timofeeva LN, Klimova GS. Political science today: interdisciplinary approaches. The Authority. 2022;30(3):276-279. DOI: 10.31171/vlast.v30i3.9091. EDN: SYOMRW. (In Russian) 15. Tulchinsky GL. Three narratives of political science: perspectives of interdisciplinary political studies. Political Expertise: Politex. 2019;15(2):20-46. EDN: QIVPPT. (In Russian) 16. Tkhagapsoev KhG. In Search of a New Methodological Paradigm of Political Science. The Principle of Identity. 2013;(4):173-181. EDN: QIVPPT. (In Russian) 17. Fadeeva L. Identity as political science term: research area and cognitive resource. Political Science (Ru). 2016;(2):164-180. EDN: WCJRIV. (In Russian) 18. Fadeicheva MA. Annotations of dissertations, defended in dissertation council д 004.018.01 of the Institute of Philosophy and Law, Ural branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, in 2010-2011. Research Yearbook of the Institute of Philosophy and Law of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2011;(11):569-580. EDN: OWZLZR. (In Russian) 19. Chigasheva MA, Yelizaryeva MA, Nagumanova VA, Makushkina EA. Language, politics, and identity: an interdisciplinary investigation of modern political discourse. Professional Discourse & Communication. 2023;5(2):31-45. DOI: 10.24833/2687-0126-2023-5-2-31-45. EDN: EBZRLA. (In Russian) 20. Shadzhe AY. Identity policy in the interdisciplinary context. Bulletin of Adyghe State University. Series: Regional Studies: Philosophy, History, Sociology, Jurisprudence, Political Science, Cultural Studies. 2022;(4):139-147. DOI: 10.53598/2410-3691-2022-4-309-139-147. EDN: KSRLEU. (In Russian) 21. Ehkzekova MN. Political in the context of post-non-classical philosophy: transformation of political identity in the context of developing secularity: cand. phil. sci. diss. Kazan; 2022. 152 p. (In Russian) 22. Yankovskaya NI. Problems of civil-patriotic education in the dissertation research of civil identity: discursive analysis. Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2017;(4):34-38. DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X- 2017-4-34-38. EDN: YHVDOP. (In Russian) 23. Laclau E, Mouffe Ch. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London; New York; 1985. 218 p. 24. Laclau E. The Making of Political Identities. London: Verso; 1994. 296 p. 25. Laclau E, Badiou N. Revolutionary Subjectivity in Post-Marxist Thought. London: Nottingham Trent University; 2014. 160 p. DOI: 10.4324/978131560633
Full articleAn Interdisciplinary Approach as a Methodological Basis for Studying the Discourse of Political Identity in Dissertation Research by Russian Scientists