| Annotation |
The modernization of vocational education in the country has been going on for
three decades. During this time, about ten major programs have been implemented
only at the federal level and many projects in the regions. The most significant tasks
were solved in terms of positioning the country’s vocational education system in the
world. Their reflection was the world rankings. Management decisions on the development
of regional universities in the country have not yet led to any significant result
in solving the issue of the disproportion of the development of higher education in
the “center/periphery” system. The object of the study is the territorial organization
and differences of vocational education in Russia at the regional level; the subject of
the study is the factors of territorial management. The purpose of the study is a comprehensive
analysis of growth management factors and decision making. Research objectives are analysis of the sectoral, territorial situation and potential opportunities.
Leading scientific and educational centers «continue» to draw on the main financial,
human and intellectual resources, which does not contribute to the socio-economic
development of peripheral regions. One of the key problems of the regional universities’
development has become a constant decrease in the number of students as a
result of a shortage for the first year. For the university itself, the line is marked for the
loss of scientific and pedagogical schools due to the reduction of personnel and their
reproduction dynamics, and the associated further degradation as a university in its
classical mission. Traditional methods of career guidance used in universities do not
work properly. It is concluded that there is a need for other approaches to the organization
of processes based on the formation of growth management factors – territorial
clusters “school-university” and “school-university-business” in terms of creating
a business environment, building social capital for students along the entire chain
of interaction. The university of the future and students should be involved in the
economic, socio-cultural space of the region at the modern level of interactions and
processes, and not only territorially. |
| Key words |
territorial administration,regional universities,positioning, growth points,management, factors,migration of applicants,development programs,region, Far Eastern region |
| References |
1. Baryshnikova M. Yu., Vashurina E. V., Sharykina E. A., Sergeev Yu. N., Chinnova I. I. The role of
flagship universities in the region: models of transformation. Educational Issues, no. 1, pp. 8–43, 2019. DOI:
10.17323/1814-9545-2019-1-8-43. (In Rus.).
2. Vileykis A., Maxim N. Cursed by geography. NOZH.2022. Web. 27.12.2022. http//knife.media. (In Rus.).
3. Information and analytical materials based on the results of monitoring the effectiveness of the activities
of educational institutions of higher education in 2022. Monitoring (VO). Web. 27.12.2022. http//miccedu.ru. (In
Rus).
4. Itskowitz G. Triple helix model. Innovation, no. 4, pp. 5–10, 2011. (In Rus.).
5. Kranzeeva E. A. New models of universities: contribution to regional development. University
management: practice and analysis, vol. 21, no. 5. pp. 64–73, 2017. (In Rus.).
6. Makarova M. N., Merzlyakova I. A. Pseudo-competition as a mechanism for transforming the selection
system into a regional university in the context of a demographic decline. Statistics and Sociology of Education,
no. 2, pp. 223–235, 2009. (In Rus.).
7. Monitoring the quality of university admissions. Moscow: Higher School of Economics. Web. 27.12.2022.
https://ege.hse.ru. (In Rus).
8. Report on the implementation of the “Third Mission” of the National Research University Higher School
of Economics for 2019/2020. National Research University Higher School of Economics. Moscow: Higher
School of Economics, 2020. (In Rus.).
9. Pitukhin E. A., Semenov A. A. Management of flows of interregional educational migration of graduates.
Economics and Management, no. 7, pp. 64–69, 2014. (In Rus.).
10. Development of innovative ecosystems of universities and research centers. Saint Petersburg: RBC;
Ingria: MISiS, 2015. (In Rus.).
11. Razinkina I. V. Development of the Innovation Spiral: A Comparative Analysis of Innovation Models of
the Triple, Quadruple and Five Spirals. Economic Sciences, no. 1, pp. 131–137, 2022. (In Rus.).
12. Results of monitoring information on trends in the development of higher education in the world and in
Russia. Russian University of Economics named after G. V. Plekhanov. Issue. 10. Interaction of universities with
industrial partners. Web. 21.03.2023. https://www.rea.ru/ru/org/managements/Nauchno-issledovatelskijj-institutrazvitija-
obrazovanija/Documents/Мониторинг%20Выпуск%201.%20ЦИФРОВИЗАЦИЯ.pdf. (In Rus.).
13. Rating of innovative development of subjects of the Russian Federation. Issue 7. Comp. V. L. Abashkin,
G. I. Abdrakhmanova, S. V. Bredikhin. Ed. L. M. Gokhberg. Moscow: Higher School of Economics, 2021. (In
Rus.).
14. Sannikova O. V., Khotinets V. Yu. Transit University as a factor of interregional educational migration.
Bulletin of the Udmurt University, vol. 27, iss. 1, pp. 41–45, 2017. (In Rus.).
15. Shtykhno D. A., Konstantinova L. V., Gagiev N. N., Smirnova E. A., Nikonova O. D. Transformation
of university models: analysis of development strategies for world universities. Higher education in Russia,
vol. 31, no. 6. pp. 27–47, 2022. (In Rus.).
16. Goldstein H. The “entrepreneurial turn” and regional economic development mission of universities.
Annals of Regional Science, no. 44, pp. 83–109, 2010. (In Eng.).
17. Etzkowitz H., Webster A., Gebhardt C. The Future of the University and the University of the Future:
Evolution of Ivory Tower to Entrepreneurial Paradigm. Research Policy, no. 29, pp. 313–330, 2000. (In Eng.).
18. Kimatu J. N. Evolution of strategic interactions from the triple to quad helix innovation models for
sustainable development in the era of globalization. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, vol. 5, pp. 16,
2016. (In Eng.). |
