| Bibliographic description |
Kaliev A. Using the method of comparative studies and hermeneutics in the study of ethnic conflicts // Transbaikal State University Journal, 2017, vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 43-50. DOI: 10.21209/2227-9245-2017-23-11-43-50. |
| Annotation |
An analysis of interethnic conflicts as a problem phenomenon in geopolitical space was carried out. The use of the method of comparativistics and hermeneutics in the study of interethnic conflicts is suggested. It is established that with the help of this method it is possible to determine how the number of certain ethnic groups is reduced under the influence of migration and other factors, while others are increasing. It is noted that ethnic groups try to preserve their historical experience, culture, traditions and customs. The facts confirming their demands for national-territorial autonomy are highlighted. It was revealed that such actions are usually accompanied by conflict phenomena and often lead to human casualties, material losses, and also cause people to distrust each other. The bases of the ethnos study, the reasons for interethnic clashes in Kyrgyzstan are indicated. The necessity of using the method of comparativistics and hermeneutics is grounded in the fact that it can contribute to the solution and prevention of interethnic conflicts among the community. The first historical evolutionary stage of hermeneutics is analyzed. Taking into account the fact that hermeneutics is the art of interpreting concepts such as the will of the gods, ways and their aspirations, it is concluded that when solving the problems of interethnic clashes that occurred in Kyrgyzstan, traditional and religious methods, as well as Islamic religious values |
| References |
1. Abdulatipov R. G. Vlast i sovest: politiki, lyudi i narody v labirintah smutnogo vremeni (Power and conscience: Politicians, people and peoples in labyrinths of troubled times). Moscow: Slav. Dialogue, 1994. 284 p.
2. Avsentiev V. A. Sotsis (Socis), 1996, no. 12, pp. 43—50.
3. Akunov A. A., Kangeldiev A. N., Mambetalieva G. S. Politologiya (Political science). Bishkek: Technic, 2015.357 p.
4. Antsupov A. Ya., Shipilov A. I. Konfliktologiya (Conflictology). Moscow: EKSMO, 2009. 512 p.
5. Alisheva A. R. Puti k ehtnicheskomu miru v Kyrgyzstane (Paths to the ethnic world in Kyrgyzstan). Bishkek, 2012. 94 p.
6. Artikbaev M. T. Politologiya (Political Science). Bishkek, 2013. 228 p.
7. Botokanova G. Integratsiya obrazovaniya (Integration of education). Bishkek, 2014, no. 1, pp. 71—76.
8. Bromley Yu. V. Etnos ipolitika (Ethnos and politics). Moscow: Izd-vo URAO, 2000. 400 p.
9. Drobizheva L. M., Kuznetsov I. M. MirRossii (World of Russia), 2000, no. 4, pp. 149—162.
10. Drobizheva L. M. Ot tolerantnosti k soglasiyu: materialy Mezhdunar. konf. (From tolerance to harmony: materials of international conference). Мoscow: IEARAN, 1997. 267 p.
11. Tishkov V. A., Shabayev Yu. P. Etnopolitologiya: politicheskie funktsii etnichnosti (Ethnopolitology: political functions of ethnicity). Moscow: Moscow State University, 2011. 376 p.
12. Tishkov V. Stepanov V. Etnopoliticheskaya situatsiya v Rossii i sopredelnyh gosudarstvah (Ethnopolitical situation in Russia and neighboring countries). Moscow, 2008. 256 p.
13. Togusakov O. A., Zhumagulov M. Zh., Baibosunov K. S. Filosofiya (Philosophy). Bishkek, 2007. 105 p.
14. Chotaeva CH. D. Etnichnost i etnosy Kyrgyzstana (Ethnicity and Ethnicities of Kyrgyzstan). Bishkek, 2011.139 p.
15. Elebaeva A. B., Dzhusupbekova M., Omuraliev N. A. Oshskiy mezhnatsionalny konflikt: sotsiologicheskiy analiz (Osh interethnic conflict: sociological analysis). Bishkek: Ilim, 1991. 187 p.
16. Olzak S. The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements (The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements). Oxford: Blackwell, 2004, p. 666—693.
17. Roy O. International Affairs (International Affairs), 2005, no. 81 (5). |
