References |
1. Ivanov O. B., Buchwald E. M. Spatial development strategy and the main directions of its actualization.
STAGE: Economic Theory, Analysis, Practice, no. 1, pp. 7–23, 2021. (In Rus.).
2. Kagansky V. L. The situation of borders and logical-semiotic types of borders. International Journal of
Cultural Studies, no. 4, pp. 5–27, 2015. (In Rus.).
3. Kolosov V. Theoretical limology: new approaches. International Processes, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 44–59,
2003. (In Rus.).
4. Manakov A. G., Evdokimov S. I. Skobari: historical maturity of borders and regional identity. Cultural and
Humanitarian Geography, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 28–38, 2013. (In Rus.).
5. Pronina L. I. Transformation of Russia\'s socio-economic and spatial development strategies based on
the creation of a national planning system. Economics and Management: Problems, Solutions, vol. 1, no. 5,
pp. 5–14, 2021. (In Rus.).
6. Anderson J. E. Theoretical foundations of the equation of gravity. American Economic Review, vol. 69,
no. 1, pp. 106–116, 1979. (In Eng.).
7. Barrios C., Flores E., Angeles M. M. Club convergence in innovation activity in European regions.
Papers in Regional Science, vol. 98, no. 4, pp. 1545–1565, 2019. (In Eng.).
8. Bartkowska M., Riedl A. Regional convergence clubs in Europe: identification and conditioning factors.
Economic Modelling, vol. 29, pp. 22–31, 2012. (In Eng.).
9. Cappello R., Caragliu A., Fratesi U. Breaking down borders: physical, institutional and cultural obstacles.
Economic Geography, vol. 94, no. 5, pp. 485–513, 2018. (In Eng.).
10. Gennari P., D’Orazio M. A statistical approach to assessing progress in achieving the SDG goals.
Statistical Journal of the IAOS, vol. 36, pp. 1129–1142, 2020. (In Eng.).
11. Guo H., Minier J. Borders, geography and economic activity: the case of China. Regional Science
and Urban Economics, vol. 90, 2021. Web. 21.12.2022. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352 377162_
Borders_Geography_and_Economic_Activity_The_Case_of_China. (In Eng.).
12. Hagerstrand T. Innovation Diffusion as a Spatial Process. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press,
1967. (In Eng.).
13. Hisakawa N., Jankowski P., Paulus G. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, vol. 40,
no. 1, pp. 18–27, 2013. (In Eng.).
14. Kinfemichael B., Morshed A. K. M. M. Economic Modelling, vol. 76, pp. 270–280, 2019. (In Eng.).
15. Lamont M., Molnár V. Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 167–195, 2002. (In Eng.).
16. Markowska M., Sobolewski M. Comparative Economic Research, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 99–123, 2016.
(In Eng.).
17. Medeiros E. Regional Studies, vol. 51, no. 8, pp. 1259–1269, 2017. (In Eng.).
18. Meyer W. Political Geography, vol. 92, 2022. Web. 21.12.2022. https://www.researchgate.net/
publication/355 140606_Borderlands_of_the_local_state. (In Eng.).
19. Rivera P. P., Vazquez F. J. C. Eastern Journal of European Studies, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 41–62, 2019.
(In Eng.).
20. Sala-i-Martin X. European Economic Review, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1325–1352, 1996. (In Eng.).
21. Topaloglou L., Kallioras D., Manetos P., Petrakos G. Journal of Borderlands Studies, vol. 20, no. 2,
pp. 67–89, 2005. (In Eng.).
22. Van Houtum H. Journal of Borderlands Studies, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 57–83, 2000. (In Eng.). |