| Article |
|---|
| Article name |
SCIENTIFIC DIALOGUE IN MODERN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS: domestic and foreign views |
| Authors |
Konkin A.. , Romanova I.V. doctor of social sciences, il.romanova2010@yandex.ru |
| Bibliographic description |
|
| Category |
Politology |
| DOI |
327 |
| DOI |
10.21209/2227-9245-2022-28-10-79-90 |
| Article type |
|
| Annotation |
The authors analyze the existing approaches to the definition of scientific dialogue and scientific diplomacy, define the role of scientific dialogue in solving modern problems in the development of the theory of international relations. The research question is: how could scientific dialogue contribute to the development of modern international relations?
The aim of the research is to identify key problems related, on the one hand, to the development of scientific dialogue in contemporary theory of international relations, and, on the other hand, to the formation of scientific diplomacy as one of the tools of contemporary international relations. The hypothesis of the research is that the presence of an adequate scientific dialogue contributes not only to improving the scientific basis for studying international relations, but also to their practice, in particular, to solving the global problems facing humanity. The object of the research is scientific dialogue in the system of international political and social relations. The subject of the research is theoretical and methodological foundations and peculiarities of scientific knowledge formation in the modern system of international relations and world politics. The main way of argumentation is the analysis of individual situations, factors, as well as generalized and specific data. The methodological basis of the research is based on the structural approach, which allows to investigate the problem of the scientific dialogue development in the modern system of international relations and world politics in a multidimensional way. The methods of research are the analysis of scientific sources on the topic under study, as well as data from related fields (philosophy, history, economics).
It has been found that the lack of an adequate and informed dialogue between representatives of various national schools of international relations studies plays a negative role in the development of science in general. Based on the results of a theoretical analysis of the role of scientific dialogue in international relations, the most important aspects of its development, problems and prospects in modern political conditions are analyzed. The authors note that the insufficiently high quality of scientific dialogue is due to the lack of adequate information, tense relations between states, prejudice, and a high level of mistrust.
On the other hand, the authors also examine the role of scientific diplomacy in shaping the interaction between the scientific and political spheres. Applying the tools of science diplomacy will enable governments to move beyond conventional wisdom about the role of science communities in global politics, and developing a research base in this area will provide an effective starting point for assessing how science, innovation and technology influence the response to the deepest and most pressing problems of global development. Despite the limited number of publications on the subject of scientific diplomacy and scientific dialogue, especially among domestic researchers, innovations and scientific achievements play a significant role in shaping the modern landscape of world politics in the current social and technological conditions, and therefore the chosen topic seems to be relevant.
The development of scientific dialogue and scientific diplomacy plays a crucial role in world politics, since without scientific cooperation in the modern world it is impossible to effectively combat global challenges. The need to change the attitude towards the phenomenon and practice of science diplomacy as a platform for discussion and critical practice is also analyzed
|
| Key words |
Key words: scientific dialogue, scientific diplomacy, international relations, world politics, theory of international relations, worldview paradigms, philosophy of international relations, scientific creativity, Russian science, world science |
| Article information |
Konkin A., Romanova I. Scientific dialogue in modern international relations: domestic and foreign views // Transbaikal State University Journal, 2022, vol. 28, no. 10. pp. 79-90. DOI: 10.21209/2227-9245-2022-28-10-79-90 |
| References |
1. Aleksandrov E. P. Vestnik TIUiE (Bulletin of the TIUE), 2014, no. 1, pp. 52–57.
2. Batalov E. YA. Mezhdunarodnye protsess (International processes), 2004, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 4–15.
3. Bolshaya entsiklopediya Kirilla i Mefodiya (The Great Encyclopedia of Kyril and Methodius). Available at: https://megabook.ru (date of access: 21.11.2022). Text: electronic.
4. Vayskopf V. Fizika v dvadtsatom stoletii (Physics in the twentieth century). Moscow: Atomizdat, 1977. 257 p.
5. Volkenshteyn V. M. Literaturnaya entsiklopediya: Slovar literaturnyh terminov (Literary Encyclopedia: Dictionary of Literary Terms). Moscow; Leningrad: L. D. Frenkel Publ., 1925. Vol. 2. 577 p.
6. Glazman M. S. Nauchnoe tvorchestvo kak dialog (Scientific creativity as a dialogue). Moscow: Prosveshchenie, 1969. 232 p.
7. Drevnegrechesko-russkiy slovar: okolo 70000 slov (Ancient Greek-Russian dictionary: about 70,000 words). Moscow: GIS, 1958. Vol. 1. 1043 p.
8. Krynzhina M. D. Mezhdunarodnye protsess (International processes), 2018, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 193–208.
9. Kudashov V. I. Dialogichnost kak forma bytiya soznaniya: filos. Ocherki (Dialogicity as a form of consciousness being: philos. essays). Krasnoyarsk: Krasnoyarsk Higher School of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation, 1998. 162 p.
10. Kurbatov V. I. Sovremennaya zapadnaya sociologiya: Analiticheskiy obzor kontseptsiy (Modern Western Sociology: An Analytical review of concepts). Rostov-on-Don: Feniks, 2001. 416 p.
11. Mirsky E. M., Sadovsky V. N. Problemy issledovaniya kommunikatsiy v nauke (Problems of communication research in science). Moscow: Progress, 1976. Pp. 5–27.
12. Oleynov A. G. Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba (Public service), 2011, no. 3, pp. 82–87.
13. Raynhardt R. O. Nauchny dialog (Scientific dialogue), 2020, no. 3, pp. 385–401.
14. Rossiyskaya nauka mezhdunarodnyh otnosheniy: novye napravleniya (Russian Science of International Relations: new directions). Moscow: Per Se, 2005. 415 p.
15. Slavgorodskaya L. V. Nauchny dialog (lingvisticheskie problemy) (Scientific dialogue (linguistic problems)). Leningrad: Nauka, 1986. 168 p.
16. Shestopal A. V., Silant\'eva M. V. Vestnik MGIMO universiteta (Bulletin of the MGIMO University), 2012, no. 6, pp. 168–171.
17. Balakina E. Karadeniz Uluslararası Bilimsel Dergi. 2014. No. 22. Pp. 11–25.
18. Boot A. W. A., Thakor A. V. The Journal of Finance. 1993. Vol. 48, no. 4. Pp. 1349–1378.
19. Heisenberg W. Der Teil und das Ganze. Munchen: Piper-Verlag, 1972. 230 p.
20. Hellmann G. International Studies Review. 2003. Vol. 5, no. 1. Pp. 123–123.
21. Kaltofen C., Acuto M. Global Policy. 2018. Vol. 9. Pp. 8–14.
22. Keating V. C., Kaczmarska K. Journal of International Relations and Development. 2019. Vol. 22, no. 1. Pp. 1–27.
23. Nye Jr J. S. New Perspectives Quarterly. 2009. Vol. 26, no. 2. Pp. 7–9.
24. Ruffini P. B. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy. 2020. Vol. 15, no. 3. Pp. 371–382.
|
| Full article | SCIENTIFIC DIALOGUE IN MODERN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS: domestic and foreign views |
