Annotation |
Questions of valuation and revaluation of fixed assets in a market environment inevitably arise. This is due to the increased role of assessing the effectiveness of asset management. The harmonization of national and international accounting standards allows us to consider the assessment and revaluation processes, both from the point of view of the accounting system and from the point of view of the financial consequences of the procedures performed.
The purpose of the study is to study the historical background and systematize approaches to the assessment and revaluation of fixed assets according to Russian and international standards.
To achieve this goal, the following tasks are set: to study the methods and historical aspect of revaluation; to study the conceptual framework of revaluation and impairment; to systematize the general provisions of the methodology for assessing the value of fixed assets during revaluation and impairment.
The object of the study is fixed assets.
In the course of the study, the history of revaluation of the cost of fixed assets is considered, the conceptual apparatus of the cost of fixed assets is analyzed in relation to the procedures for revaluation and impairment testing, the methodology of revaluation and impairment is considered.
The paper concludes that it is necessary to introduce into the practice of accounting and management procedures for assessing the value of fixed assets and revaluing them, which will allow us to obtain reliable information when analyzing the impact of cost changes on the indicators used in determining the effectiveness of activities |
Article information |
Gonin V., Panchenko E., Kibireva E., Nomokonova O. Approaches to the valuation and revaluation of fixed assets according to russian and international standards // Transbaikal State University Journal, 2021, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 87–98. DOI: 10.21209/2227-9245-2021-27-3-87-98. |
References |
1. Baramzin K. N. Otsenka investitsiy (Investment Assessment), 2016, vol. 4, no. 4. pp. 26‒36.
2. Getman V. G. Uchyot. Analiz. Audit (Accounting. Analysis. Audit), 2019, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 67‒72.
3. Getman V. G. Uchyot. Analiz. Audit (Accounting. Analysis. Audit), 2020, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 42‒48.
4. Gonchar E. A., Skripacheva S. S. Vestnik YUUrGU. Seriya «Ekonomika i menedzhment» (Bulletin of SUSU. Series “Economics and Management”), vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 114‒122.
5. Druzhilovskaya T. Yu. Mezhdunarodny buhgalterskiy uchyot (International Accounting), 2018, vol. 21, issue 9, pp. 1086‒1099.
6. Druzhilovskaya T. Yu., Druzhilovskaya S. E. Uchyot. Analiz. Audit (Accounting. Analysis. Audit), 2021, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 48‒61.
7. Kesyan S. V., Eremina N. V., Bezhanyan Z. B. Nauchnyy zhurnal KubGAU (Scientific Journal of KubGAU), 2017, no. 130. DOI: 10.21515/1990-4665-130-040.
8. Kulikova L. I. Uchyot. Analiz. Audit (Accounting. Analysis. Audit), 2016, no. 3 p. 129‒142.
9. Kulikova L. I. Uchyot. Analiz. Audit (Accounting. Analysis. Audit), 2014, no. 1. pp. 140‒144.
10. Sorokina E. M., Makarenko S. A. Mezhdunarodny buhgalterskiy uchyot (International Accounting), 2019, vol. 22, issue 7, pp. 766‒778.
11. Tuyakova Z. S., Satalkina E. V. Mezhdunarodny buhgalterskiy uchyot (International Accounting), 2016, vol. 19, issue 19, pp. 34‒47.
12. Khlynin E. V., Korovkina N. I. Izvestiya Tulskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki (Proceedings of the Tula State University. Economic and Legal Sciences), 2015, no. 4-1, pp. 437‒449.
13. Hughes S.B., Lowensohn S., Tefre E. Portable power: An application of IAS 16 including self-constructed assets and the revaluation model (Portable power: An application of IAS 16 including self-constructed assets and the revaluation model). Issues in Accounting Education. 2019;34(2):61–71. DOI: 10.2308/iace‑52391.
|