Article
Article name PROBLEMS OF THE SOCIAL AND RELIGIOUS SECURITY SYSTEM FORMATION IN THE RUSSIAN-CHINESE BORDER REGION IN FOREIGN STUDIES
Authors Romanova I.V. ,
Kononov S.. ,
Shevchenko M.. ,
Shevchenko Y.. ,
Bibliographic description
Category Politology
DOI 322
DOI 10.21209/2227-9245-2021-27-3-60-70
Article type
Annotation The study is devoted to the analysis of Western research on aspects of social security of the Russian-Chinese border. The article provides the allocation social security aspects in the Western descriptions of the Russian-Chinese border in the XVII-XIX centuries. The degree of political conjuncture influence on the interpretation of the social security of the Russian-Chinese border is determined; Modern transformations of the critical concept of social development of border Russian-Chinese territories in the XXI century are analyzed. The novelty of the study is determined by the fact that it is the first analysis of the factors and patterns assessments of social security formation in the territory of the Russian-Chinese border in the works of European and American authors. The result is the determination of the development vector of the Western Social Security methodology of the Russian-Chinese border area from early idealizations to positivist descriptions and a “critical concept”, where Russia is assigned the role of a social threat. The second result is to identify the content of the critical concept of the social security of the Russian-Chinese border, which is that Russian-Chinese relations are perceived by Western researchers as the factor in the lagging of regional society development from the global level. The third result is to analyze the transformation of the critical concept of the social security of the Russian-Chinese border, which is recognized by the regional framework independence and its dependence not so much from the Western trends of globalism but on the influence of East Asian players, the leading among which is China
Key words social security; region; China; Russia; Russian-Chinese border; Russian-Chinese interaction; Western studies of Russian-Chinese interaction; critical concept of social security; social security factors; social security system of a region, religious security
Article information Romanova I., Kononov S., Shevchenko М., Shevchenko Yu. Problems of the social and religious security system formation in the Rusian-Chinese border region in foreign studies // Transbaikal State University Journal, 2021, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 60–70. DOI: 10.21209/2227-9245-2021-27-3-60-70.
References 1. Bzhezinsky Z. Velikaya shahmatnaya doska: Gospodstvo Ameriki i ego geostrategicheskie imperativy (The Great Chessboard: American Domination and its Geostrategic imperatives). Moscow: AST, 2013. 703 p. 2. Zhukov A. V. Religioznoe mifotvorchestvo v obydennoy religioznosti naseleniya Baykalskogo regiona: dis. … dokt. filos. n.: 09.00.14 (Religious myth-making in the everyday religiosity of the population of the Baikal region: dissertation of the doctor of philosophy: 09.00.14). Chita, 2011. 372 p. 3. Zhukov A. V., Zhukova A. A. Vestnik Zabaykalskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta (Bulletin of the Transbaikal State University), 2014, no. 1, pp. 120‒128. 4. Zhukov A. V., Zhukova A. A. Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kulturologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki (Historical, philosophical, political and legal sciences, cultural studies and art history. Questions of theory and practice), 2014, no. 3-1, pp. 54‒58. 5. Zhukov A. V., Zhukova A. A., Vlasova K. E. Izvestiya Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Politologiya, Religiovedenie (Irkutsk State University Bulletin. Series «Political Scene, Religious Studis)», 2015, vol. 11, pр. 87‒96. 6. Zhukov A. V. Vestnik Chitinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta (Bulletin of the Chita State University), 2010, no. 2, pp. 129‒136. 7. Zhukov A. V. Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kulturologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki (Historical, philosophical, political and legal sciences, cultural studies and art history. Questions of theory and practice), 2017, no. 12-4, pp. 66‒71. 8. Morze Kh.B. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya Kitayskoy imperii (International relations of the Chinese Empire). NY: New York, 1918, 1570 p. 9. Harrison M. Vestnik Evropy (Bulletin of Europe), 2014, no. 38. Available at: http://magazines.russ.ru/vestnik/2014/39 (date of access: 12.03.2021). Text: electronic. 10. Acharya A. The End of the American World Order (The End of the American World Order). Cambridge: Polity, 2018, 224 p. 11. Aris S., Snetkov A. Russian Analytical Digest (Russian Analytical Digest), 2018, no. 213, 7 February, рp. 9‒13. 12. Blank S. NBR Special Report (NBR Special Report), 2011, no. 26, рp. 4‒19. 13. Buzan B., Lawson G. The Global Transformation: History, Modernity, and the Making of International Relations (The Global Transformation: History, Modernity, and the Making of International Relations). Cambridge: University Press, 2015, рp. 157–182. 14. Fawcett L. Interregionalism and the European Union. Post-revisionist Approach to Europe’s Place in a Changing World (Interregionalism and the European Union. Post-revisionist Approach to Europe’s Place in a Changing World). Abington: Routledge, 2016, рp. 33‒55. 15. Freire M. R., & Simão L. European Politics and Society (European Politics and Society), 2015, 16, рp. 126–141. 16. Garnett Sh. W. A Report to the Trilateral Commission (A Report to the Trilateral Commission), 2000, 80 p. 17. Gomart Th. Guerres invisibles ‒ Nos prochains défis géopolitiques (Guerres invisibles ‒ Nos prochains défis géopolitiques). Paris: Éditions Tallandier, 2021, 317 p. 18. Kissinger H. On China (On China). NY: The Penguin Press, 2011. 586 p. 19. Kotkin S. Manchurian Railways and the Opening of China: An International History (Manchurian Railways and the Opening of China: An International History). Armonk; NY, 2010. 235 p. 20. Quested R.K.I. “Matey” imperialists. The Tsarist Russians in Manchuria 1895–1917 (“Matey” imperialists. The Tsarist Russians in Manchuria 1895–1917). Hong-Kong: Centre of Asian Studies, 1982, 430 pp. 21. Lo B. Russia and the New World Disorder (Russia and the New World Disorder). Washington: Brookings Institution Press, 2015, 344 p. 22. Masafumi A. Modern Asian Studies (Modern Asian Studies), 2010, nov., vol. 44, Iss. 6, рр. 1283–1311. 23. Morse H.B. MacNair H.F. Far Eastern international relations (Far Eastern international relations). Boston: Houghton Mifflin and Company, 1931, 846 p. 24. Nyman J. Review of International Studies (Review of International Studies), 2016, 42, рp. 521‒839. 25. Pempel T. J., Tsunekawa K. Two Crises, Different Outcomes: East Asia and Global Finance (Two Crises, Different Outcomes: East Asia and Global Finance). By. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2016, 280 p. 26. Rozman G. Uneasy Triangle: China, Russia, and the United States in the New Global Order, Center on Global Interests (Uneasy Triangle: China, Russia, and the United States in the New Global Order, Center on Global Interests), 2015, October, рp. 19‒26. 27. Schimmelpenninck van der Oye D. Toward the Rising Sun: Russian Ideologies of Empire and the Path to War with Japan. DeKalb, Ill (Toward the Rising Sun: Russian Ideologies of Empire and the Path to War with Japan. DeKalb, Ill), 2001, 329 р. 28. Wishnick E. NBR Analysis Brief (NBR Analysis Brief), 2015. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/43545459/The_New_China_Russia_U_S_Triangle (date access: 12.03.2021). Text: electronic. 29. Zhukov A., Bernyikevich T. MATEC Web of Conferences. electronic edition (MATEC Web of Conferences. electronic edition), 2018, р. 10003. 30. Zhukov A. V., Kononov S. V. Tarih Kültür ve Sanat Araştırmaları Dergisi (Tarih Kültür ve Sanat Araştırmaları Dergisi). Available at: http://kutaksam.karabuk.edu.tr/index.php/ilk/article/view/2848 (date access: 12.03.2021. Text: electronic.
Full articlePROBLEMS OF THE SOCIAL AND RELIGIOUS SECURITY SYSTEM FORMATION IN THE RUSSIAN-CHINESE BORDER REGION IN FOREIGN STUDIES