| Annotation |
The aim of the study is to resolve the contradiction between understanding the social security of regions as security within the framework of a single Russian social space, and understanding it as an indicator of the autonomy of regions. The study uses a modeling method that makes it possible to synthesize the provisions on the social security of Russian regions within the framework of the concepts of their “unity” and “regionality”. The result of the conducted research is the formation of a dynamic model of social security of Russian regions, within the framework of which the process of continuous construction of normative and value concepts, instilled in the regional community through the surrounding society’s influence, as well as social agreements aimed at achieving conjunction within the social space of Russian regions, is taking place. The second result is the definition of the social security of Russian regions as a process in which, depending on the situational influence of objective and subjective factors, either centrifugal or regional trends prevail. The third result is the statement that, for a long time, despite the significant difference in the civilizational nature of the regions, the Russian social space remains intact, which indicates the prevalence of unifying tendencies and the lack of desire in Russian regions to leave the all-Russian social space |
| References |
1. Bzhezinsky Z. Velikaya shahmatnaya doska. Gospodstvo Ameriki i ego geostrategicheskie imperativy (The Great Chessboard. American Domination and its Geostrategic Imperatives). Moscow: AST, 2013. 703 p.
2. Morze H.B. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya Kitayskoy imperii (International Relations of the Chinese Empire). New York: New York, 1918. 1570 p.
3. Olbrayt M. Religiya i mirovaya politika (Religion and World Politics). Moscow: Alpina, 2007. 352 p.
4. Tetcher M. Iskusstvo upravleniya gosudarstvom: strategii dlya menyayushchegosya mira (The art of government. Strategies for a changing world). Moscow: Albina Publisher, 2003. 504 p.
5. Fishman O. L. Kitay v Evrope: mif i realnost (XIII‒XVIII vv.) (China in Europe: Myth and Reality (XIII‒XVIII centuries)). St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg Oriental Studies, 2003. 544 p.
6. Harrison M. Vestnik Evropy (Bulletin of Europe), 2014, no. 38. Available at: http://magazines.russ.ru/vestnik/2014/39 (date of access: 17.02.2021). Text: electronic.
7. Acharya A. The End of the American World Order (The End of the American World Order). Cambridge: Polity, 2018, 224 p.
8. Alagappa M. The ASAN Forum (The ASAN Forum). 2014. Available at: http://www.theasanforum.org/international-peace-in-asia-will-it-endure (date of access: 17.02.2021). Text: electronic.
9. Allworth E. Central Asia, 120 Years of Russian Rule (Central Asia, 120 Years of Russian Rule). Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 1989, 606 p.
10. Aris S., Snetkov A. Russian Analytical Digest (Russian Analytical Digest), 2018. no. 213, 7 February, рp. 9‒13.
11. Blank S. NBR Special Report (NBR Special Report), 2011, no. 26, рp. 4‒19.
12. Buzan B., Lawson G. The Global Transformation: History, Modernity, and the Making of International Relations (The Global Transformation: History, Modernity, and the Making of International Relations). Cambridge University Press, 2015, рp. 157–182.
13. Forsyth J. A History of the Peoples of Seberia. Russia’s North Asian colony 1581‒1990 (A History of the Peoples of Seberia. Russia’s North Asian colony 1581‒1990). Cambridge: Cambridge univ. press, 1994, vol. XX, 455 s.
14. Fawcett L. Interregionalism and the European Union. Post-revisionist Approach to Europe’s Place in a Changing World (Interregionalism and the European Union. Post-revisionist Approach to Europe’s Place in a Changing World). Abington: Routledge, 2016, рp. 33‒55.
15. Freire M. R., & Simão, L. European Politics and Society (European Politics and Society, 2015, 16, рp. 126–141.
16. Garnett Sh. W. A Report to the Trilateral Commission (A Report to the Trilateral Commission), 2000, 80 p.
17. Gomart Th. Guerres invisibles ‒ Nos prochains défis géopolitiques (Guerres invisibles ‒ Nos prochains défis géopolitiques). Paris: Éditions Tallandier, 2021, 317 p.
18. Kissinger H. On China (On China). New York: The Penguin Press, 2011. 586 p.
19. Kotkin S. Manchurian Railways and the Opening of China: An International History (Manchurian Railways and the Opening of China: An International History). Armonk; NY, 2010. 235 p.
20. Quested R.K.I. “Matey” imperialists. The Tsarist Russians in Manchuria 1895–1917 (“Matey” imperialists. The Tsarist Russians in Manchuria 1895–1917). Hong-Kong: Centre of Asian Studies, 1982. 430 p.
21. Lo B. Russia and the New World Disorder (Russia and the New World Disorder). Washington: Brookings Institution Press, 2015, 344 p.
22. Masafumi A. Modern Asian Studies (Modern Asian Studies), 2010, Nov, vol. 44, Iss. 6. рр. 1283–1311.
23. Morse H.B., MacNair H.F. Far Eastern international relations (Far Eastern international relations). Boston: Houghton Mifflin and Company, 1931, 846 p.
24. Nyman J. Review of International Studies (Review of International Studies), 2016, 42, рp. 521‒839.
25. Pempel T. J., Tsunekawa K. Two Crises, Different Outcomes: East Asia and Global Finance (Two Crises, Different Outcomes: East Asia and Global Finance). By. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2016, 280 p.
26. Rozman G. Center on Global Interests (Center on Global Interests), 2015, October, рp. 19‒26.
27. Schimmelpenninck van der Oye D. Toward the Rising Sun: Russian Ideologies of Empire and the Path to War with Japan (Toward the Rising Sun: Russian Ideologies of Empire and the Path to War with Japan). DeKalb, Ill, 2001, 329 р.
28. Wishnick E. Analysis Brief NBR (Analysis Brief NBR). 2015. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/43545459/The_New_China_Russia_U_S_Triangle (date of access: 17.02.2021). Text: electronic.
29. Zhukov A., Bernyikevich T. MATEC Web of Conferences. electronic edition (MATEC Web of Conferences. electronic edition), 2018, р. 10003.
|
