| Article |
|---|
| Article name |
IMPLEMENTATION OF ANTI-CORRUPTION POLICY IN THE DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC SECURITY AND COUNTERACTION OF CORRUPTION OF THE ADMINISTRATION OF MINISTRY OF INTERNAL AFFAIRS OF RUSSIA FOR THE TRANSBAIKAL REGION, AS A POLITICAL PROCESS |
| Authors |
Beidina T.. doctor of political sciences, professor, beydina@inbox.ruPogulich O.. candidate of sociological sciences, assistant professo, oxy-pusik@rambler.ruDurov Y.. Postgraduate Student, yaroslove.you@mail.ruNovikova A.. candidate of political sciences, associate professor, assistant professor, anna_novikova2010@mail.ru |
| Bibliographic description |
|
| Category |
Politology |
| DOI |
321 |
| DOI |
10.21209/2227-9245-2021-27-2-52-64 |
| Article type |
|
| Annotation |
The article is relevant, since it provides an assessment of anti-corruption policy as a political process at the regional and local levels. Purpose of the article: to identify the stages of the political process on anti-corruption policy focused on the prevention of the negative consequences of corruption. The levels of the political process, as substantiated in the article, are associated with the development of socio-economic and political differences between regions. The identification of these levels is the scientific novelty of this study. In the modern period, there is a crisis of international relations, globalization and the strengthening of national trends, including in the dynamics of the development of political processes. The fight against terrorism, the COVID-19 epidemic, environmental problems, and anti-corruption policies are not united in a global perspective, but “disintegrate” into national apartments and become problems of individual countries, not the entire modern community. This is the specificity of the political process at the global and national levels. The article is devoted to the problems of managing economic security, and combating corruption of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation for the Transbaikal Region (hereinafter UEBiPK UMVD of Russia for the Transbaikal Region), further which is part of the police. This organization is an operational subdivision that carries out, within its competence, operational-search activities directed against crimes in relation to state power, the interests of the civil service and service in local government bodies.
The specificity of the activities of the UEBiPK UMVD of Russia for the Transbaikal Region is the identification and documentation of economic, corruption malfeasance, as well as the implementation of operational support for anti-corruption policy. Anti-corruption policy as a political process in the Transbaikal Region is unstable, taking into account the cross-border specifics and has four levels: detection, response, prevention and evaluation of effectiveness. This conclusion is a scientific achievement of the authors. In addition, the author analyzes the political stability that is necessary for the implementation of the anti-corruption policy of the Transbaikal Region. The main thrust of this policy is economic crimes committed using information and communication technologies. The article describes the effectiveness of anti-corruption policy in the Transbaikal Territory |
| Key words |
anti-corruption policy; anti-corruption; Transbaikal Region; corruption crimes; economic security; state power; local authorities; state policy; methods of combating corruption; political process; information security |
| Article information |
Beidina T., Pogulich O., Durov Y., Novikova A. Implementation of anti-corruption policy in the department of economic security and counteraction of corruption of the Administration of Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia for the Transbaikal Region, as a political process // Transbaikal State University Journal, 2021, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 52–64. DOI: 10.21209/2227-9245-2021-27-2-52-64. |
| References |
1. Alekseeva E. V. Leningradskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal (Leningrad Law Journal), 2016, no. 4, pp. 97–103.
2. Berezinskaya, M. D., Azarov, A. Yu. Informatsionnoe obshchestvo: sostoyanie, problemy, perspektivy: mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. internet-konferentsiya (Information Society: state, problems, and prospects: international scientific and practical research. online conference) Moscow, 2017. pp. 45–52.
3. Organizovannaya prestupnost (Organized crime) / ed. by A. I. Dolgova, S. V. Dyakov. Moscow: Criminological Association, 2003. 411 p.
4. Esipov V. M. Prestupnost: strategiya boriby: sb. st. (Criminality: strategy of struggle: collection of articles). Moscow: Criminological Association, 2007. 243 p.
5. Ilin M. V. Politicheskaya nauka (Political science), 2002, no. 3, pp. 5–21.
6. Mishin, G. K. Problema ekonomicheskoj prestupnosti (opyt mezhdisciplinarnogo izucheniya): monografiya (The problem of economic crime (experience of interdisciplinary study): monograph). Moscow: VNII MVD of Russia, 1994. 88 p.
7. Polyhan K. O. Ustoychivoe razvitie nauki i obrazovaniya (Sustainable development of science and education), 2019, no. 5, pp. 154–160.
8. Sizmin M. A. Izvestiya Irkutskoy gosudarstvennoy ekonomicheskoy akademii (Baykalskiy gosudarstvenny universitet ekonomiki i prava) (Proceedings of the Irkutsk State Economic Academy (Baikal State University of Economics and Law)), 2014, no. 3, p. 28.
9. Chebotareva A. A. Vestnik Akademii prava i upravleniya (Bulletin of the Academy of Law and Management), 2016, no. 1, pp. 48–51.
10. Andress, J The Basics of Information Security: Understanding the Fundamentals of InfoSec in Theory and Practice (The Basics of Information Security: Understanding the Fundamentals of InfoSec in Theory and Practice). New York: Syngress, 2014. 240 p.
11. Hughes, J. Technology Innovation Management Review (Technology Innovation Management Review), 2013, vol. August, p. 15–24.
12. Samonas S. Journal of Information System Security (Journal of Information System Security), 2014, vol. 10, issue. 3, p. 21–45.
|
| Full article | IMPLEMENTATION OF ANTI-CORRUPTION POLICY IN THE DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC SECURITY AND COUNTERACTION OF CORRUPTION OF THE ADMINISTRATION OF MINISTRY OF INTERNAL AFFAIRS OF RUSSIA FOR THE TRANSBAIKAL REGION, AS A POLITICAL PROCESS |
