| Annotation |
The relevance of the article is due to the growing importance of the regional security factor in modern conditions, where the level of regional self-awareness and the desire for relative autonomy are growing within the framework of the general process of developing the security system. The article is devoted to the analysis of the security concepts existing in the history of political doctrines in order to identify the evolution of ideas about “regional security”. The study uses comparative, systemic and hermeneutic methods, the action of which is aimed at identifying aspects of regional security in the texts devoted to the problems of state, national and public security. The novelty of the research is associated with the development of the ideas’ evolution about regional security from abstract ideas to various aspects of regional practice. The result of the study is the evidence that, being originally one of the aspects of general management theory, the ideas of regional security at the end of the twentieth century have become the core of the concept of “regional security complexes”. The next result was the substantiation that modern criticism of this concept is the basis of the theoretical constructions of regional security in the 21st century, which are based on a synthesis of ideas about the need to adopt rules adopted by states that support the stability of world security and the influence of regions with their own interests. The conclusion of the study is to assert that modern concepts of regional security are based on the synthesis of methodologies of the systemic and constructivist approaches. This methodology is used to substantiate the assertion that any state is forced to deal with the security problems of its regions, to pay attention to the existing threats and regional interests in them, which may be of a constructive nature, and may pose a real danger associated with challenges from the political, economic, military, environmental, social spheres
|
| References |
1. Avgustin. O grade Bozhiem (About the City of God). Moscow: ACT, 2000, 1296 p.
2. Gegel G. V. F. Filosofiya prava (Philosophy of Law). Moscow: Nauka, 1979, 526 p.
3. Gobbs T. Sochineniya (Essays). Moscow: Mysl, 1991, vol. 2, 731 p.
4. Zagryatskov M. D. Chto takoe munitsipalny sotsializm? (What is municipal socialism?) Moscow: Nachalo, 1917, 32 p.
5. Kazakova M. N. Regionologiya (Regionology), 2011, no, 3, рр. 40–46.
6. Kunts G., O’Donnel S. Upravlenie: sistemny i situatsionny analiz upravlencheskih funktsiy: monografiya (Management: system and situational analysis of managerial functions: monograph). Moscow: Progress, 1981, vol. 1, 250 p.
7. Lazarevsky N. I. Avtonomiya: monografiya (Autonomy: monograph). St. Petersburg: Tipolitogr. A. G. Rosen, 1906, 32 p.
8. Lenin V. I. Polnoe sobranie sochineny: v 55 t. 5-e izd. (The complete collection of works: in 55 vol-s., 5th ed. Moscow: Publishing House of Political literature, 1967, vol. 41, pp. 27–51.
9. Fuko M. Upravlenie soboy i drugimi: monografiya (Managing yourself and others: monograph). St. Petersburg: Nauka, 2011. 432 p.
10. Khabermas YU. Moralnoe soznanie i kommunikativnoe deystvie (Moral consciousness and communicative action). Moscow: Nauka, 2000, 380 p.
11. Chicherin B. N. Kurs gosudarstvennoy nauki. Obshchee gosudarstvennoe pravo: monografiya. Ch. 1 (The course of the state of science. General state law: monograph. Part 1. M.: Typolitografiya. Vys. utv. T-va I. N. Kushnerev and Co., 1894, pp. 16–18.
12. Аcharya A. The End of the American World Order (The End of the American World Order). Cambridge: Polity, 2018, 224 p.
13. Agamben G. State of Exception (State of Exception). Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 2005, 104 p.
14. Aniche E. T. African studies (African studies). London, 2020, vol. 79, nо. 1, рp. 70–87.
15. Ayoob M. International Studies Review (International Studies Review), 2002, vol. 4, no. 3 (Autumn,), рр. 27–48.
16. Beeson M., Lee-Brown T. Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies (Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies), 2016, vol. 4, no. 2,рp. 195–206.
17. Buzan B., Waever O. Powers and Regions. The Structure of International Security (Powers and Regions. The Structure of International Security). Cambridge, 2002, 387 p.
18. Coe B.N. Sovereignty in the South Intrusive Regionalism in Africa, Latin America, and Southeast Asia (Sovereignty in the South Intrusive Regionalism in Africa, Latin America, and Southeast Asia). Cambridge: University Press, 2019, 238 p.
19. Cusack A.K. Venezuela, ALBA, and the Limits of Postneoliberal Regionalism in Latin America and the Caribbean (Venezuela, ALBA, and the Limits of Postneoliberal Regionalism in Latin America and the Caribbean). Palgrave Macmillan, 2019. 218 p.
20. Fawcett L. Interregionalism and the European Union. Post-revisionist Approach to Europe’s Place in a Changing World / Ed. by M. Telo, L. Fawcett, F. Ponjaer (Interregionalism and the European Union. Post-revisionist Approach to Europe’s Place in a Changing World / Ed. by M. Telo, L. Fawcett, F. Ponjaert). Abington: Routledge, 2016, рр. 33–55.
21. Jervis R. Cooperation Under the Security Dilemma // World Politics. 1978. Т. 30, вып. 2. С. 167–214.
22. Jones R. W. Security, Strategy and Critical Theory (Security, Strategy and Critical Theory). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 1999, 196 p.
23. Lake D. A. Hierarchy in international relations (Hierarchy in international relations). London: Cornell University Press, 2011, 232 p.
24. Nyman J. Review of International Studies (Review of International Studies), 2016, no. 42, рp. 521–839.
|
