| Annotation |
The article is devoted to the actual problem of agro-industrial complex development and its important branch – agriculture. The state plays a big role in self-regulation of the branch, as motivation and resources in disposal of hotel economic entities do not allow to provide effective functioning and positive dynamics. The Transbaikal region ranks 63rd in the Russian Federation in terms of the volume of agricultural production, and in actual prices it is equal to 22,903.4 million rubles, which is 0.43 % of the total share of production in Russia. The share of agriculture in the GRP structure of the Transbaikal Territory is 7.62 %. The government has developed a programs and a number of subprograms for the regions to develop the industry. The authors paid attention to agricultural development subprograms developed for the Transbaikal region.
Animal husbandry is a significant sub-industry in the agricultural sector, which accounts for 74.97 % of the region’s total. Today, there is a negative situation in the sub-industry, namely a decrease in production by many indicators. Measures of state support of agriculture aimed at development of livestock sub-branch in the region form negative and positive trends. A significant part of money, namely 41.7 % of the total amount of financing, falls on the sub-program, which indirectly affects the situation in the sub-branch.
The authors have considered the methods of evaluation of the implementation of measures proposed for the development of the industry. The bias of methods which formally testify to a positive tendency that does not lead to real growth of volumes of production is revealed. The conclusion is made, that at an increase in financing there is no growth of production of animal industries, target indicators often did not reach planned values. The methodology used by regional authorities to assess the efficiency of programs (subprograms) implementation is not aimed at the dynamic growth of the industry as a whole |
| References |
1. Aseeva T. A., Kiselev E. P., Sukhomirov G. I. Selskoye hozyaystvo Dalnego Vostoka: usloviya, problemy i potentsial razvitiya (Agriculture of the Far East: conditions, problems and development potential). Khabarovsk, 2020. 16 p.
2. Balaeva S. I. Nauchnoye obespecheniye innovatsionnogo razvitiya agropromyshlennogo kompleksa regionov RF: sb. st. (Scientific support for the innovative development of the agro-industrial complex of the regions of the Russian Federation: collected articles). Lesnikovo, 2018, pp. 25–30.
3. Buzdalov I. N. Obshchestvo i ekonomika (Society and Economics), 2018, no. 3, pp. 75–92.
4. Valovy regionalny produkt Zabaykalskogo kraya v 2010–2019 godah: stat. sb. (Gross regional product of the Transbaikal Territory in 2010–2019: statistical compilation). Chita: Transbaikalkraistat, 2020. 27 p.
5. Glazyrina I. P., Faleychik L. M., Faleychik A. A. Izvestiya RAN. Seriya geograficheskaya (News of the RAS. Geographical series), 2020, vol. 84, no. 3, pp. 341–358.
6. Ministerstvo selskogo khozyaystva Zabaykalskogo kraya (Ministry of Agriculture of the Transbaikal Territory). URL: http://mcx.75.ru/gospodderzhka (Date of access: 12.05.2020). Text: electronic.
7. Zabelina I. A., Delyuga A. V. EKO (ECO), 2019,no. 5, pp. 66–88.
8. Pomazkova N. V. Agrarnaya Rossiya (Agrarian Russia), 2018, no. 5, pp. 43–48.
9. Proizvodstvo produktsii selskogo hozyaystva Zabaykalskogo kraya v 2014–2019 godah: stat. sb. (Production of agricultural products of the Transbaikal Territory in 2014–2019: statistical compilation). Chita: Transbaikalkraistat, 2020. 50 p.
10. Selskoye hozyaystvo v strukture APK (Agriculture in the structure of the agricultural sector). URL: http://geolike.ru/page/gl_1482.htm (Date of access: 12.05.2020). Text: electronic.
11. Selskoye hozyaystvo Zabaykalskogo kraya (Agriculture of the Transbaikal Territory). URL: https://ab-centre.ru/page/selskoe-hozyaystvo-zabaykalskogo-kraya (Date of access: 12.05.2020). Text: electronic.
12. Sotsialno-ekonomicheskoye polozheniye gorodskih okrugov i munitsipalnyh rayonov Zabaykalskogo kraya: stat. sb. (Socio-economic situation of urban districts and municipal areas of the Transbaikal Territory: statistical compilation). Chita: Transbaikalkraistat, 2020.140 p.
13. Stolbovskaya N. N., Lesnyak T. I. Innovatsionnyye tehnologii v mashinostroyenii, obrazovanii i ekonomike (Innovative technologies in mechanical engineering, education and economics), 2018, vol. 14, no. 1-2, pp. 499–502.
14. Sukhomirov G. I. Problemy razvitiya territorii (Problems of development of the territory), 2015, no. 5, pp. 156–169.
15. Chibisova I. S. Epoha nauki (The Epoch of Science), 2018, no. 13, pp. 92–96.
16. Chislennost naseleniya selskih naselennyh punktov Zabaykalskogo kraya: stat. sb. (The population of rural settlements of the Transbaikal Territory: statistical compilation). Chita: Transbaikalkraistat, 2020. 63 р.
17. Monfreda C., Ramankutty N., Foley J. A. Global Biogeochemical Cycles (Global Biogeochemical Cycles), 2014, vol. 22, no. CD1022, pp. 19.
18. Willer H., Lernoud J. The world of organic agriculture. Statistics and emerging trends 2016 (The world of organic agriculture. Statistics and emerging trends 2016). URL: http://www.organicworld.net/yearbook/yearbook-2016.html (Date of access: 12.05.2020). Text: electronic.
|
