Article
Article name MODELING OF INTERREGIONAL INTERACTION OF SUBJECTS OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION IN THE INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX
Authors Smirnova O.. ,
Ponomareva A.. ,
Bibliographic description
Category Economics
DOI 332.1
DOI 10.21209/2227-9245-2019-25-9-131-143
Article type scientific
Annotation The article substantiates the relevance and importance of the problems of spatial development of the subjects of the Russian Federation due to the heterogeneity of their development and the existing interregional contrasts. The experience of interregional cooperation in Russia is considered. The importance of industrial cooperation for the socio-economic and industrial development of the Urals is noted. Interregional relations of the 10 subjects of the Russian Federation included in the Volga and Ural Federal districts, formerly called “Big Ural”, are investigated. Based on the method of spatial econometrics, the article reveals the possibilities of interaction of territories in terms of their resource potential and geographical location. The study was conducted on the interaction of regions in four areas of industrial cooperation: resources, production, personnel and technology. It is established that the locomotive of growth in the sphere of resource interaction is the Khanty-Mansi Autonomous District; the leaders of production cooperation are the Tyumen region and the Republic of Bashkiria. Sverdlovsk region is the leader of cooperation in terms of training potential. Extremes for further development of interregional technological infrastructure are the Republic of Bashkiria and Sverdlovsk region. The study shows that the development of interregional cooperation in the real sector of the economy requires the development of a single economic policy of macro-regions, taking into account the comparative competitive advantages of the territories. The study has shown that inter-regional cooperation and industrial cooperation of territories will contribute to improving business efficiency and development of territories by using the advantages of specialization, reducing the risks of projects, as well as improving economic security by reducing the import dependence of regions
Key words Keywords: interregional cooperation; industry; spatial modeling; economic policy; region; macroregion; industrial and innovation clusters; industrial cooperation; Great Urals; spatial development
Article information Smirnova O., Ponomareva A. Modeling of interregional interaction of subjects of the Russian Federation in the industrial complex // Transbaikal State University Journal, 2019, vol. 25, no. 9, pp.131-143
References References 1. Gichiev N. S. Regionalnaya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika (Regional Economics: theory and practice), 2018, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 58–67. 2. Kuznetsov S. V., Mezhevich N. M., Lachininsky S. S. Ekonomika regiona (Economics of the region), 2015, no. 3, pp. 25–38. 3. Kuznetsova Е. P. Rossiya: tendentsii i perspektivy razvitiya (Russia: trends and development prospects), 2018, no 13, pp. 990–996. 4. Lexin V. N., Shvetsov A. N. Gosudarstvo i regiony: teoriya i praktika gosudarstvennogo regulirovaniya territorialnogo razvitiya (State and regions: theory and practice of state regulation of territorial development). Moscow: Librocom, 2016. 370 p. 5. Markov L. S. Sovet direktorov Sibiri (Siberian board of directors), 2012, no. 11, pp. 18–19. 6. Markov L. S. Teoretiko-metodologicheskie osnovy klasternogo podhoda (Theoretical and methodological foundations of the cluster approach). Novosibirsk: IEOPP SB RAS, 2015. 300 p. 7. Nikolaev M. A., Makhotaeva M. Yu. Nauchno-tekhnicheskie vedomosti Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. Ekonomicheskie nauki (Scientific and Technical Journal of the St. Petersburg State Polytechnic University. Economic sciences), 2016, no. 1, pp. 47–57. 8. Nikolaev M. A., Makhotaeva M. Yu. Nauchno-tehnicheskie vedomosti Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo politehnicheskogo universiteta (Scientific and Technical Sheets of the St. Petersburg State Polytechnic University), 2012, no. 2–2, pp. 53–60. 9. Nikolaev M. A., Makhotaeva M. Yu. Ekonomist (Economist), 2015, no. 3, pp. 42–49. 10. Pavlov Yu. V., Koroleva Ye. N. Prostranstvennaya ekonomika (Spatial Economics), 2014, no. 3, pp. 95–110. 11. Pilipenko I. V. Modernizatsiya ekonomiki i globalizatsiya: sb. st. V 3 t. T. 3 (Modernization of the economy and globalization: collection of articles. Art. 3 vol. 3), Moscow: HSE, 2009, pp. 285–296. 12. Porter M. Konkurentsiya (Competition). Moscow: Williams, 2005. 608 p. 13. Skopina I. V., Skopin A. O. Kompleksnoe razvitie regionalnoy proizvodstvennoy kooperatsii i klasternyh proektov (Complex development of regional production cooperation and cluster projects). URL: https://www.eee-region.ru/article/901 (Date of access: 17.08.2019). Text: electronic. 14. Anselin L. Geographical Analysis (Geographical Analysis), 1995, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 93–115. 15. Chen Y. New approaches for calculating Moran’s index of spatial autocorrelation (New approaches for calculating Moran’s index of spatial autocorrelation). URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/250925586_New_Approaches_for_Calculating_Moran’s_Index_of_Spatial_Autocorrelation (Date of access: 17.08.2019). Text: electronic. 16. Conley T. G., Ligon E. Journal of Economic Growth (Journal of Economic Growth), 2002, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 157–187. 17. Le Gallo J. International Regional Science Review (International Regional Science Review), 2004, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 138–163. 18. Moreno R., Trehan B. Journal of Economic Growth (Journal of Economic Growth), 1997, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 399–418. 19. Rey S. J., Montouri B. D. U. S. Regional Studies (Regional Studies), 1999, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 143–156.
Full articleMODELING OF INTERREGIONAL INTERACTION OF SUBJECTS OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION IN THE INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX