Article
Article name SPECIFICATIONS OF A CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF THE DIGESTIVE SYSTEM OF SUSSCROFADOMESTICUS UNDER TECHNOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
Authors Belyanovskaya A.. postgraduate, belyanovskaya@ensam.eu
Baranovskaya N.V. Doctor of Biological Sciences, Associate Professor, Professor, School of Natural Resources Engineering, nata@tpu.ru
Bertrand Laratte .. , laratte@u-bordeaux.fr
Nicolas Perry .. professor, nicolas.perry@u-bordeaux.fr
Bibliographic description
Category Earth science
DOI 504.054
DOI 10.21209/2227-9245-2019-25-7-18-26
Article type scientific
Annotation The relevance of the work is determined by the need to expand knowledge about the characteristics of the concentration and distribution of chemical elements in the organs and tissues of mammals, as indicators of the potential negative impact on the health of the population. The article discusses the influence of anthropogenic environmental impact on the formation of the elemental composition of a mammalian organism on the example of the domestic pig organs and tissues (Susscrofusdomesticus) sampled in the city of Ekibastuz, Pavlodar region of the Republic of Kazakhstan. The article studies the laws of concentration of chemical elements in the digestive system as a whole and its individual components. The accumulation of As, Br, in the oropharynx, Lu in the stomach, Rb, U in the small intestine, Sb in the large intestine, Au, Ag in the rectum is especially noted. It is proved that the digestive system of a domestic pig reacts to human impact, forming powerful biochemical barriers. The concentration of chemical elements varies depending on the part of the gastrointestinal tract, as the acid-base balance changes and depending on the physiological function of the organs studied. It has been proven that the nature of industrial exposure is reflected in the chemical composition of pigs\' homemade biological materials. The organs of the gastrointestinal tract actively accumulate heavy, rare-earth (Lu, Ce, La), radioactive metals (Th, U) and arsenic. The chemical affinity of a pig\'s body is domestic to human, and the analogy of the behavior of chemical elements in mammals as a whole suggests that the patterns can be attributed to humans, but this assumption requires further refinement.
Key words Key words: radioactive elements; rare earth elements; instrumental neutron-activation analysis; technogenesis; living matter; geochemical barriers; domestic pig SusScrofaDomesticus; geochemistry of living matter; mining industry; Ekibastuz city
Article information Belyanovskaya A., Baranovskaya N., Larat B., Perry N. Specifications of a chemical composition of the digestive system of susscrofadomesticus under technological environmental impact // Transbaikal State University Journal, 2019, vol. 25, no.7, pp.18-26
References REFERENCES 1. Baranovskaya N. V., Rikhvanov L. P. Problemy biogeohimii I geohimicheskoy ekologii (Problems of Biogeochemistry and Geochemical Ecology), 2011,no. 3,pp. 78–84. 2. Rusina E. Yu. Nauchnoe soobshchestvo studentov XXI stoletiya. Estestvennye nauki: materialy XXXI mezhdunarodnoy studencheskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii (Scientific community of students of the XXI century. Natural sciences: materials of the XXXI international student scientific-practical conference). Novosibirsk, 2018, no. 5. 3. Sembaev J. Kh. Vestnik Kazanskogo Natsionalnogo meditsinskogo universiteta (Bulletin of the Kazan National Medical University), 2014, no. 3, pp. 225–230. 4. Baranovskaya N., Belyanovskaya A., Bezel V., Mukhacheva S., Anufrieva M. IOP Conference. Series Earth and Environmental Science (IOP Conference.Series Earth and Environmental Science), 2016, vol. 43. 5. Carpenè E., Andreani G., Isan G. Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology Trace elements in unconventional animals (Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology Trace elements in unconventional animals), 2017,no. 43,pp. 169–179. 6. Durkalec M., Nawrocka A., Krzysiak M., Larska M., Kmiecik M., Posyniak A. Chemosphere (Chemosphere), 2018, no. 193,pp. 454–463. 7. Gastroscan.ru (Gastroscan.ru). URL: http://www.gastroscan.ru/handbook/117/406 (Date of access 09.05.2018). Text: electronic. 8. Huang L., Chen T., Xiuwen, H., Yang H., Wang C., Liu M., Yao M. Journal of the Optical Society of America (Journal of the Optical Society of America), 2017, vol. 56, pp. 24–28. 9. Meurens F., Summerfield A., Nauwynck H., Saif L., Gerdts V. Trends Microbiol (Trends Microbiol), 2012,no. 20,pp. 50–57. 10. Park Y. M., Lee C. M., Hong J. H., Jamila N., Khan N., Jung J. H., Jung Y. C., Kim K. S.Meat Science(Meat Science), 2018, no.143,pp. 93–103. 11. Pu Y., Tang F., Adam P. M., Laratte B., Ionescu R. E.Environmental Science Technology (Environmental Science Technology), 2016, no. 50, pp. 9370–9379. 12. Wang M. Q., Wang C., Du Y. J., Li H., Tao W. J., Ye S. S., He Y. D., Chen S. Y. Livest. Science (Livest. Science), 2014,no. 161,pp. 123–129. 13. Yamagata, N.J.Journal of Radiation Research (Journal of Radiation Research), 1962, no. 3, pp. 21. 14. Zhao Y., Wang D., Yang S. Meat Science (Meat Science), 2016,no. 118,pp. 103–107.
Full articleSPECIFICATIONS OF A CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF THE DIGESTIVE SYSTEM OF SUSSCROFADOMESTICUS UNDER TECHNOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT