Article
Article name Identity in the Сoncept of Post-Industrialism
Authors Liga M.B. Doctor of Philosophy, Professor, Dean of the Faculty of Social Technologies and Management, m-Liga@inbox.ru
Schetkina I.A. Candidate of Sociology, Associate Professor, Social Work department, irinasocio@mail.ru
Gusevskaya N.Y. Candidate of Pedagogy, Associate Professor, Vice-Rector for International Affairs, gusnat1@rambler.ru
Sundueva D.B. Doctor of Cultural Studies, Associate Professor, Professor of the Theory and History of Culture, Arts, and Design department, dina-sundueva@yandex.ru
Subbotina N.D. Doctor of Philosophy, Professor, Professor of the Philosophy department, dialectica@yandex.ru
Bibliographic description Liga M. B., Shchetkina I. A., Gusevskaya N. Yu., Sundueva D. B. , Subbotina N. D. Identity in the concept of post-industrialism // Transbaikal State University Journal. 2025. Vol. 31, no. 4. P. 84–94. DOI: 10.21209/2227- 9245-2025-31-4-84-94
Category Politology
DOI 159.923.2
DOI 10.21209/2227- 9245-2025-31-4-84-94
Article type Original article
Annotation The key consequence of modern social transformations has been the formation of a post-industrial society, the concept of which was developed within the framework of the theory of post-industrialism. Its foundation is knowledge, intellectual and technological resources. This society is characterized by the dominance of the service sector, a focus on quality of life and the transformation of the social structure. According to the concept of postindustrialism, which studies society as an integrated developing system, the central object of change is man. Its values and identity, which are undergoing transformation under the influence of evolutionary processes, have become decisive. This fact makes it possible to actualize their study as a key category. The aim of the research is identity as a social reality. The purpose of the article is to substantiate the peculiarities of identity reflection through the concepts of post-industrialism. The objectives of the research are to identify the factors that determine a person’s search for his identity in a post-industrial society; to describe the technologies for determining a person’s identity; to identify the content of multiple, individual, fluid identity characteristic of a post-industrial society. The study uses a constructivist approach, which has allowed to consider identity as a flexible, fragmented, changing phenomenon. Within the framework of this approach, it becomes possible to identify the factors that determine the identity formation in a post-industrial society. Theoretical methods have been applied: comparative analysis, classification, deduction and induction to study identity as a flexible construct. The study has revealed that in a society based on knowledge and technology, identity acquires a dual character: it simultaneously accumulates external social changes and itself acts as an active factor in personal transformation. It has been established that the traditional determinants of identity (class or nationality) are giving way to new ones – knowledge, education and intellectual work, which are becoming key resources for achieving a high social status. The conducted research has allowed to determine that identity in modern society becomes an individual project that a person works on throughout his life, facing internal conflicts generated by its multiplicity and variability.
Key words identity, post-industrial society, concepts of post-industrialism, fluid identity, multiple identity,virtualization of identity, constructivism, identity crisis, information resources, identity construction
Article information
References 1. Bauman Z. Individualizirovannoe obshchestvo. [Individualized society.] Moscow: Logos; 2005. 390 p. (In Russian) 2. Bauman Z. From pilgrim to tourist. Sociological Journal. 1995;(4):134-154. Available at: http://jour.isras. ru/index.php/socjour/article/viewFile/218/219 (accessed 15.10.2025). EDN: UAHBAV. (In Russian) 3. Bell D. Gryadushchee postindustrial’noe obshchestvo. Opyt sotsial’nogo prognozirovaniya. [The Coming Post-Industrial Society: An Experiment in Social Forecasting.] Moscow: Academia; 1999. 783 p. (In Russian) 4. Bell D. Sotsial’nye ramki informatsionnogo obshchestva. [Social framework of the information society.] In: Novaya tekhnokraticheskaya volna na Zapade. [New technocratic wave in the West.] Moscow: Progress; 1986. P. 330-342. (In Russian) 5. Berger P, Lukman T. Sotsial’noe konstruirovanie real’nosti. Traktat po sotsiologii soznaniya. [Social construction of reality. A treatise on the sociology of consciousness.] Moscow: Medium; 1995. 323 p. (In Russian) 6. Bodriiyar Zh. Obshchestvo potrebleniya: ego mify i struktury. [Consumer society: its myths and structures.] Moscow: Respublika: Kul’turnaya revolyutsiya; 2006. 268 p. (In Russian) 7. Burd’e P. Prakticheskii smysl. [Practical meaning.] Saint Petersburg: Aleteiya; 2001. 562 p. EDN: QOGTMH. (In Russian) 8. Giddens Eh. Ustroenie obshchestva. Ocherk teorii strukturatsii. [The structure of society. An essay on the theory of structuration.] Moscow: Akademicheskii Proekt; 2005. 528 p. (In Russian) 9. Dobrina OA. Social risks of modernity and threats to identity: systematic analysis of Z. Bauman’s concept. Systems Psychology and Sociology. 2019;(4):92-102. DOI: 10.25688/2223-6872.2019.32.4.08. EDN: QATRML. (In Russian) 10. Semenenko IS (ed). Identichnost’: lichnost’, obshchestvo, politika. Novye kontury issledovatel’skogo polya. [Identity: Individual, Society, Politics. New Contours of Research.] Moscow: Ves’ mir; 2023. 512 p. (In Russian) 11. Kastel’s M. Vlast’ kommunikatsii. [The power of communication.] Moscow: Izd. dom Vysshei shkoly ehkonomiki; 2023. 591 p. EDN: KPGAGG. (In Russian) 12. Kastel’s M. Stanovlenie obshchestva setevykh struktur. [The emergence of a network society.] In: Novaya postindustrial’naya volna na Zapade. Antologiya. [The New Post-Industrial Wave in the West. An Anthology.] Moscow: Academia; 1999. P. 494-505. (In Russian) 13. Korkunova OV. Anthropological views of Kassirer as the reason for developing philosophical researches in XX century. Discourse-P: Scientific and Practical Almanac. 2007;(1):48-50. EDN: TQTDZR. (In Russian) 14. Kuznetsova EI. The digital age: facets of a new socio-cultural experience. Society: Philosophy, History, Culture. 2023;(4):36-40. DOI: 10.24158/fik.2023.4.4. EDN: QSUWEH. (In Russian) 15. Maklyuehn M. Galaktika Guttenberga. Stanovlenie cheloveka pechatayushchego. [The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typography.] Moscow: Akademicheskii Proekt; 2018. 448 p. (In Russian) 16. Malashenko AV, Nisnevich YuA, Ryabov AV. Stanovlenie postindustrial’noi tsivilizatsii: ot tsifrovizatsii do varvarstva. [The Rise of Post-Industrial Civilization: From Digitalization to Barbarism.] Moscow: Yurait; 2025. 212 p. Available at: https://urait.ru/bcode/566407 (accessed 01.10.2025). (In Russian) 17. Martsinkovskaya TD, Andreeva (Golubeva) NA, Preobrazhenskaya SV. Information identity and perception of information as a new digital everyday life. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology. 2023;13(3):347-361. DOI: 10.21638/spbu16.2023.304. EDN: UORWFR. (In Russian) 18. Ravochkin NN, Rvalov PN. E. Toffler`s futuroshock and social forecasts. Kant. 2023;(4):235-240. DOI: 10.24923/2222-243X.2023-49.42. EDN: ONVNGI. (In Russian) 19. Solovieva LN. Identity in digital transformation: theoretical and methodological focus. Society: Philosophy, History, Culture. 2022;(11):76-81. DOI: 10.24158/fik.2022.11.12. EDN: NKNPZC. (In Russian) 20. Solovieva LN. Digital identity as a phenomenon of information modernity. Society: Philosophy, History, Culture. 2020;(12):53-56. Available at: http://dom-hors.ru/rus/files/arhiv_zhurnala/fik/2020/12/philosophy/ solovieva.pdf (accessed 20.09.2025). DOI: 10.24158/fik.2020.12.7. EDN: KJUDBK. (In Russian) 21. Toffler Eh. Tret’ya volna. [The third wave.] Moscow: AST; 2004. 781 p. (In Russian) 22. Toffler Eh. Shok budushchego. [Future shock.] Moscow: ACT; 2002. 557 p. (In Russian) 23. Shibanova NA (ed). Upravlenie regional’nymi konfliktami v usloviyakh tsifrovizatsii sovremennogo obshchestva: metodologiya i praktiki realizatsii. [Regional Conflict Management in the Context of Digitalization of Modern Society: Methodology and Implementation Practices.] Kazan: Iz-vo Kazanskogo universiteta; 2021. 629 p. (In Russian) 24. Uehbster F. Teorii informatsionnogo obshchestva. [Theories of the information society.] Moscow: Aspekt-press; 2004. 400 p. (In Russian) 25.Vlasova I, Gulyy A, Gurov M, Evstratova Yu, Isaeva N, Kamensky A, et al. Human identity in the digital age: humanitarian and social aspects. Moscow: INFRA-M; 2024. 140 p. (In Russian) 26. Chernavin YuA. Digital identity of a person: the essence, features of occurrence and manifestation. Chelovecheskij Kapital. 2022;(12-2):74-78. Available at: https://humancapital.su/wp-content/ uploads/2022/12/202212том2_p074-078.pdf (accessed 01.10.2025). EDN: VEWHQI. (In Russian) 27. Shamaeva VV, Zueva AV. The problem of personal self-identification in the modern information society. Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Philosophy. 2021;(4):35-44. EDN: OGZCSM. (In Russian) 28. Ehrikson Eh. Identichnost’: yunost’ i krizis. [Identity: Youth and Crisis.] Moscow: Flinta; 2006. 341 p. (In Russian) 29. Jaspers K, Baudrillard J. Vlast’ Massy. [The Power of the Masses.] In: Prizrak tolpy. Filosofskii poedinok. [The Phantom of the Crowd. Philosophical Duel.] Moscow: Rodina; 2020. P. 11-204. (In Russian) 30. Gakh D. A Look into the Future: Post-Information Society. In: Institute of Control Systems of ANAS; 2022. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/360216783_Vzglad_v_budusee_postinformacionnoe_ obsestvo (accessed 18.09.2025). DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.18163.40481 31. Bell D. The cultural contradictions of capitalism. New York: Basic Books; 1976. 328 p. 32. Giddens A. Nowoczesnossc i tozsamoss: «Ja» I spoleczenstwo w epoce póznej nowoczes nosci. Warszawa: Wyd. Naukowe PWN; 2001. 322 p. 33. Zajdа J. Major Discourses of Cultural Identities. In: Discourses of Globalisation, Multiculturalism and Cultural Identity; 2023 P. 1-13.
Full articleIdentity in the Сoncept of Post-Industrialism