| Annotation |
This study presents a comprehensive analysis of the relationship between investment attractiveness and industrial development in the Transbaikal Territory. The relevance of this study stems from the fact that the further development of the Region’s industrial sector directly depends on its investment attractiveness. The object of the study is the industrial sector of the economy and the investment attractiveness of the Transbaikal Territory. The subject of the study is the indicators of industrial development and the dynamics of investments in fixed assets, along with the Region’s investment attractiveness ratings. The study has been conducted to establish the correlation between industrial output and investment volumes, and to assess their impact on the region’s investment attractiveness. This correlation will allow for investment planning based on target output levels. The methodological basis of the study comprises statistical and economic analysis methods, generalization and synthesis, and the monographic method. Statistical data and data from rating agencies are used in the analysis. The study systematically examines key aspects of this issue: an analysis of the dynamics of industrial production by main types of economic activity was carried out; revealing the structural features of regional industry; the dynamics and structure of investments have been studied with sectoral differentiation and by sources of financing, which made it possible to identify imbalances in the investment process. A comprehensive assessment of the region’s investment attractiveness is presented based on the analysis of various investment ratings and methodologies. The correlation analysis method established the relationship between investment volumes and industrial production indicators. The results of the study indicate insufficient investment growth rates for a significant increase in the region’s investment attractiveness. The identified problems include structural imbalances in financing, limited government support measures, and insufficient information transparency of the investment process. Based on the analysis, a set of measures to increase investment attractiveness is proposed, namely: expanding concessional lending by strengthening interaction between government and business, improving the programs of the Industrial Development Fund, developing advanced development territories with an expansion of the list of permitted activities, modernizing the regional investment portal, and creating a communication platform for direct dialogue between investors and the government.
|
| Key words |
industry, investments, investment attractiveness, rating, sector, economy, Transbaikal Territory, mining industry, manufacturing industry, gross regional product
|
| References |
1. Amidyanova MM. Theoretical foundations of forming investment attractiveness of the region. News of the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Tajikistan. 2021;(1):73–76. (In Russian).
2. Bochkarova IV. Assessment of investment attractiveness of the Trans-Baikal Territory. In: Management of Economic Systems: Materials of the XVI International Scientific and Practical Conference: collected articles. Chita: Transbaikal State University; 2022, P. 20–26. EDN: NXBCPZ (In Russian).
3. Burov VYu, Bass MS, Bazarova MB, Baranova OA, Bochkareva IV, Vorotii NV, Galsanov BG, Kaminskaya SV, Kapitonova NV, Kisloshchaev PA, Masalov PV, Mersheeva MB, Monich IP, Sveshnikov IV, Sekisov AG, Tumunbayarova ZhB, Tomskikh AA, Fedotova VK, Filimonov AV, Yakimov AA. Socio-economic development of the Transbaikal Territory: Problems and Prospects. Chita: Transbaikal State University; 2022. 295 p. (In Russian).
4. Bochkarov SV, Bochkarova IV, Kisloshchaev PA, Kapitonova NV. Scenarios for socio-economic development of the Transbaikal region for the period until 2035. BSU Bulletin. Economics And Management. 2023;1(43):43–52. DOI: 10.18101/2304-4446-2023-1-43-51. EDN: ZPBLFK (In Russian).
5. Bochkarova IV, Kapitonova NV. Indicators of presence and conditions to reducing the shadow sector in the mining sector in Zabaikalsy krai. Shadow Economy. 2022;6(3):121–134. DOI: 10.18334/tek.6.3.116307. EDN: JFADSO (In Russian).
6. Burov Vyu, Kisloshchaev PA, Kapitonova NV, Bochkarova IV. Monitoring of the condition of level of economic safety in Transbaikal EDGE. Fundamental Research. 2023(1):15–20. DOI: 10.17513/43414. EDN: CLHTYK (In Russian).
7. Glotko AV, Kuznetsova IG, Shelkovnikov SA, Chernienko DA. Economic indicators as indicators of the quality of life of the population. Transbaikal State University Journal. 2024;30(4):102–112. DOI: 10.21209/2227-9245-2024-30-4-102-112. EDN: HUBAKW (In Russian).
8. Damodaran A. Investment Valuation: Tools and Methods for Valuing Any Asset. Moscow: Al’pina Pablisher; 2021. 1955 p. (In Russian).
9. Doroshenko SV, Shelomenkov AG. Commodity sector, development factor or deceleration of the national economy. Modern Management Technology. 2015;(3):36–45. EDN: TSLVWN
10. Dyachenko YuK. Economic evaluation of natural resources as a factor in enhancing the investment attractiveness of mining industries: avtoref. dis. … cand.: 08.00.05. Vladivostok; 2008. 23 p. Available from: https://www.dissercat.com/content/ekonomicheskaya-otsenka-prirodnykh-resursov-kak-faktor-povysheniya-investitsionnoi-privlekat (accessed 10.03.2025). EDN: NJEOTF (In Russian).
11. Endovitsky EA, Soboleva VE. Analysis of Investment Attractiveness of the Company-Purpose At A Preintegration Stage of the Deal of Junction. Absorptions. Audit and Financial Analysis. 2007;(2):195-207. EDN: KKXYKH (In Russian).
12. Zlobina AYu. Methodical approaches to determining the investment attractiveness of an enterprise: canf sci. dis,: 08.00.05 Irkutsk; 2006. 145 р. Available from: https://www.dissercat.com/content/metodicheskie-podkhody-k-opredeleniyu-investitsionnoi-privlekatelnosti-predpriyatiya (accessed 10.03.2025). EDN: NOHPTV
13. Kapitonova NV, Kapitonova AA. Socio-economic problems of the mining industry in the Transbaikal region. In: Kulaginsky Readings, techniques and technologies of production processes: materialy XX International Scientific and Practical Conference;2020. Vol. 3, p. 212–217. EDN: PRTQVF (In Russian).
14. Krasovskaya IP, Malysheva TE. Strategy of sustainable environmental development of the industrial economy: problems, methodology, solutions. Transbaikal State University Journal. 2022:28(9):102–108. DOI: 10.21209/2227-9245-2022-28-9-102-108. EDN: PIZVGN (In Russian).
15. Litvienko VS, Sergeev IB. Innovative development of the mineral resource sector. Problemy Prognozirovaniya. 2019;(6);60–72. EDN: CHPQWI (In Russian).
16. Nesenuk ES. Investment attractiveness of a region: essence, structure, formation factors. Journal Of Applied Research. 2022:(5):35‒41. DOI: 10.47576/2712-7516_2022_5_1_35. EDN: RWTKUQ (In Russian).
17. Peshkova MKh, Shulgina OV. Modern methods of investment attractiveness of companies mineral complex. Mining informational and analytical bulletin (scientific and technical journal). Scientific and Technical Journal Mining Informational and Analytical Bulletin. 2015;(S1):193–208. EDN: TJUVOV (In Russian).
18. Soldatova SS. Modeling of financial and economic mechanisms of the management system for the strategic development of an industrial enterprise. Models, Systems, Networks In Economics, Engineering, Nature and Society. 2021;4(40):16–25. DOI: 10.21685/2227-8486-2021-4-2 EDN: UNQRBJ (In Russian).
19. Ungaeva IYu, Shabykova NE. Development of regional industrial infrastructure as a growth driver for industrial entrepreneurship. BSU Bulletin. Economics and Management. 2021;82(2):83–89. DOI: 10.18101/2304-4446-2021-2-83-89. EDN: DJQQJV (In Russian).
20. Sharpe WF, Alexander Gordon J, Bailey JW. Investments. Moscow: Invra-M; 2007. 1028 p. (In Russian).
21. Kaplan RS, Norton DP. Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system. Harvard Business Review; 1996. 330 p. EDN: CFNOVT
22. Wilson RMS, Gilligan C. Strategic Marketing Management. Planning, implementation and control. Third edition. Published by Routledge. New York; 2012. Vol. 3. DOI: 10.4324/9780080481142
|
