Article
Article name On Some Features of Construction and Operation of Technological Wells in the Cryolithic Zone
Authors Ivanov A.G. Candidate of Technical Sciences, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences, Chief Specialist, ivanov_ag@mail.ru
Wilmis A.L. Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Geotechnological Methods and Physical Processes of Mining, vilmisal@mgri.ru
Arsentiev Y.A. Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor, arsentev1956@yandex.ru
Borovkov Y.A. Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Department of Geotechnolog-ical Methods and Physical Processes of Mining, borovkovya@mgri.ru
Bibliographic description Ivanov A. G., Wilmis A. L., Arsentyev Yu. A, Borovkov Yu. A. On Some Features of Construction and Operation of Technological Wells in the Cryolithic Zone // Transbaikal State University Journal. 2024. Vol. 24, no. 30. P. 70–78. DOI: 10.21209/2227-9245-2024-30-3-70-78.
Category Subsoil Use, Mining Sciences
DOI 622.277
DOI 10.21209/2227-9245-2024-30-3-70-78
Article type Original article
Annotation A feature of Russian mineral deposits is that about 75% of them are loca­ted in the permafrost zone. Uranium deposits located in the permafrost zone and mined by the method of borehole in-situ leaching make a significant contribution to the all-Russian production of this metal. Complex mining and geological conditions of uranium mining in the permafrost zone require the adoption of extraordinary technical approaches to solving the issues of developing such deposits. The quality of process wells construction for in-situ leaching of uranium and the preservation of their operational characteristics throughout the entire period of operation. The relevance of the work is associated with the need to ensure efficient and environmentally safe uranium mining by in-situ leaching in a cryolithozone. This paper discusses the design elements of process wells that affect their operational performance, the temperature loads acting on production strings made of polymeric materials (low-density polyethylene and unplasticized polyvinyl chloride), the seasonality of well construction, and their operating modes. The author does not consider polymer materials of other types: fiberglass (have high brittleness, roads, tested in the late 1980s in Uzbekistan), metal-plastic (absolutely unsuitable for operation due to metal corrosion in case of violation of the polymer coating, for example, during repair and restoration work, were tested in Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan in 1985–1988, including with the participation of the author), polypropylene and acryl butadiene styrene pipes (low physical and mechanical characteristics). The analysis has showed that the temperature effect on polymer casing pipes is one of the most important factors, taking into account which it is possible to ensure trouble-free operation of constructed process wells. The work includes the analysis and processing of actual materials obtained during the construction and operation of wells. The conclusions have made it possible to determine the most effective technologies for equipping polymer production strings of technological wells, to select equipment elements and materials for waterproofing the casing space.
Key words cryolithozone, uranium, process wells, polymer casing, wellheads, temperature stresses, centralizers, polymer backfill materials, seasonality of work, airlift pumping
Article information
References 1. Arsentiev Yu. A., Ivanov A. G., Orekhov D. D., Gavrilov R. I. On some features of calculating the design of technological wells for uranium extraction built in permafrost rocks. Development of uranium and rare metal industry: collection of articles XI International scientific and practical conference. Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan, 2024. P. 105–110. (In Rus.) 2. Arsentiev Yu. A., Nazarov A. P., Zabaykin Yu. V., Ivanov A. G. On the calculation of operational columns made of polymer materials for permafrost conditions. Actual Problems and Prospects of Economic Development: Russian and Foreign Experience. Scientific Review, no. 21, pp. 27–32, 2019. (In Rus.) 3. Geotechnology of uranium (Russian experience): monograph / edited by I. N. Solodov, E. N. Kamneva. Moscow: KDU: University Book, 2017. 576 p. (In Rus.) 4. Gladyshev A. V., Mikhailov A. N., Solodov I. N., Suvorov A. V. The influence of genetic features of uranium deposits of the Khiagdinsky ore field on the choice of technology for mining ore deposits by borehole underground leaching. Mining Journal, no. 4, pp. 13–17, 2022. (In Rus.) 5. Uranium mining by underground leaching in the cryolithozone: monograph / edited by I. N. Solodov. Moscow: ZetaPrint, 2022. 183 p. (In Rus.) 6. Zheleznyak I. I., Stetyukha V. A. Calculation of a pipe made of a polymer material under the influence of an external load in a well in an array of permafrost rocks. Izvestiya UGSU, is. 3, pp. 121–125, 2018. (In Rus.) 7. Ivanov A. G., Arsentiev Yu. A. Basic technical requirements for the technology of constructing wells for underground uranium leaching to ensure their trouble-free operation. Development of uranium and rare metal industry: collection of articles XI International scientific and practical conference. Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan, 2024. P. 102–104. (In Rus.) 8. Ivanov A. G., Arsentiev Yu. A., Gladyshev A. V., Mikhailov A. N., Gurulev E. A., Ivanov D. A. On the issue of improving the quality of borehole underground uranium leaching in the cryolithozone. Transbaikal State University Journal, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 47–61, 2024. (In Rus.) 9. Ivanov A. G., Gurulev E. A., Alekseev N. A., Bazarov D. N., Ivanov D. A., Arsentiev Yu. A., Nazarov A. P. Features of repair of production columns of technological wells in conditions of permafrost rocks. Actual problems of the uranium industry: collection of articles IX International scientific and practical conference. Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan, 2019. P. 216–223. (In Rus.) 10. Ivanov A. G., Ivanov D. A., Arsentiev Yu. A., Nazarov A. P., Kalinichev V. N. Features of the use of polymer casing pipes in the construction of technological wells for underground uranium leaching. News of Higher Educational Institutions. Series “Geology and explorationˮ, no. 4, pp. 50–57, 2019. (In Rus.) 11. Mashkovtsev G. A., Konstantinov A. K., Miguta A. K., Shumilin M. V., Shchetochkin V. N. Uranium of the Russian subsoil. Moscow: VIMS, 2010. 850 p. (In Rus.) 12. Sergienko I. A., Mosev A. F., Bochko E. A., Pimenov M. K. Drilling and equipment of geotechnological wells. Moscow: Nedra, 1984. 224 p. (In Rus.) 13. Sidorova G. P., Manikovsky P. M., Yakimov A. A., Ovcharenko N. V. Radiation and environmental safety of fossil coals of Transbaikalia. Transbaikal State University Journal, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 36–44, 2023. (In Rus.) 14. Cuney M., Mercadier J., Bonnetti Ch. Classification of sandstone-related uranium deposits. Journal of Earth Science, no. 33, pp. 236–256, 2022. (In Eng.) 15. Tavakoli H. Z., Charkhi A., Cohbadzadth H. A review of uranium heap leaching in Iran. Materials and Nuclear Fuel Research Institute, Nuclear Science and Techology Research Institute. Tehran, Iran, 2019. (In Eng.)
Full articleOn Some Features of Construction and Operation of Technological Wells in the Cryolithic Zone