| Authors |
Morozova V.S. Doctor of Philosophical Sciences, Associate Professor, Professor, Chinese Philology department, Visiting Professor, Research China department, Southeast and South Asia, morozova1550@mail.ruDondokov D.D. senior lecturer, Chinese Philology department, dondokovdd@herzen.spb.ruYakunina T.V. Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, head of the Chinese Philology department, Institute of Oriental Studies, paulka@mail.ru |
| Annotation |
The article focuses on cultural and civilizational potential of Russian eastern borders and China border regions. The subject of this article today seems to be particularly relevant in the context of two circumstances: firstly, tourist contacts have undergone significant transformations in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, and secondly, the aggravating situation with the emergence of barriers to entry into the European tourism space makes China one of the most attractive regions for tourism development. The very concept of \"border\", regardless of the above, appears here not as a certain outpost, but as a unique sociocultural space where regional culture functioning is mediated by the influence of three cultural dimensions (national, local, foreign). The case of border regional pair the Transbaikal Region, Russia and North-East China shows the features of their culture’s interaction, which are of interest for integration into the processes of border tourism formation and development. The identified problems in the border tourism sector development are proposed to be solved, among other things, by updating the work on online platforms, which act as a modern space for the concentration and accumulation of tourist content in the era of digitalization. A possible solution to the above issues on the basis of the original \"dialogism of border area regional cultures\" model, its integration into the concept of tourism development in the border areas is indicated, as well as the vector of modern state policy regarding the development of tourism initiatives in the Russian-Chinese border area.
|
| References |
1. Kozinets A. I., Li Dan. Institutes for the Study of Russia in China. Oikumena. Regional studies, no. 2, pp. 142–150, 2018. DOI: 10.24866/1998- 6785/2018-2/141-150. (In Rus.)
2. Morozova V. S. Regional culture in the socio-cultural space of the Russian and Chinese borderlands. Diss. doc. philos. Sciences: 09.00.13. Chita, 2013. 380 p. (In Rus.)
3. Tikhonova A. Yu. Regional culture: research experience. Moscow: Direct Media, 2016. 210 p. . (In Rus.)
4. Behrooz Chaman Ara & Cyrus Amiri. Gurani: practical language or Kurdish literary idiom? British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, vol. 45, pp. 627–643, 2018. DOI: 10.1080/13530194.2018.1430536. (in Eng.)
5. Bufetova A. N., Kolomak E. A., Khruzhanovskaia A. A. The National and Religious Diversity of Siberia’s Regions. Problems of Economic Transition, vol. 61, pp. 19–37, 2019. DOI: 10.1080/10611991.2019.1691877. (in Eng.)
6. Dze S. China’s Role in the New Stage of Russia’s Development of Its Eastern Regions. Problems of Economic Transition, vol. 59, pp. 768–777, 2017. DOI: 10.1080/10611991.2017.1416836. (in Eng.)
7. Fedorova K. Interethnic Communication on the Russian-Chinese Border: Its Past and Present. Region, no. 1, pp. 83–104, 2018. Web: 25.08.2023. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26537993. (in Eng.)
8. Fomina M. N., Borisenko O. A. Globalizing Culture in Transboundary Space. IOP. Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2019. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/274/1/012143. (in Eng.)
9. Gavrilova Y., Shcetkina I., Liga M., Gordeeva N. Religious syncretism as a sociocultural factor of social security in cross-border regions. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, vol. 21, pp. 231–245, 2018. DOI: 10.1080/13674676.2018.1460590. (in Eng.)
10. Holzlehner T. Economies of Trust: Informality and the State in the Russian-Chinese borderland. Trust and Mistrust in the Economies of the China-Russia Borderlands. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2018. Pp. 65–86. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt22zmbb1.6. (in Eng.)
11. Jun Gao, Chris Ryan, Jenny Cave, Zhang Chaozhi. Tourism border-making: A political economy of China’s border tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, vol. 76. pp. 1–13, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.annals.2019.02.010. (in Eng.)
12. Koziol K. Representing \"Russianness\" in the Chinese-Russian Borderland. Eurasian Geography and Economics, vol. 61, pp. 100–108, 2020. DOI: 10.1080/15387216.2020.1727757. (in Eng.)
13. Li Song. Strategic priorities of cooperation between Heilongjiang province and Russia. R-economy, vol. 5, pp. 13–18, 2019. DOI: 10.15826/recon.2019.5.1.002. (in Eng.)
14. Li Yining. Chinese economy in Disequilibrium. Berlin: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2014. 195 p. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-39558-1. (in Eng.)
15. Limonov L., Nesena M.Regional cultural diversity in Russia: does it matter for regional economic performance? Area Development and Policy, vol. 1, pp. 63–93, 2016. DOI: 10.1080/23792949.2016.1164016. (in Eng.)
16. Max D. Woodworth &Agnieszka Joniak-Lüthi. Exploring China’s borderlands in an era of BRI-induced change. Eurasian Geography and Economics, vol. 61, pp. 1–12, 2020. DOI: 10.1080/15387216.2020.1727758. (in Eng.)
17. Peshkov I. The Trade Town of Manzhouli: Trust Created and Undermined. Trust and Mistrust in the Economies of the China-Russia Borderlands. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2018. Pp. 121–142. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt22zmbb1.9. (in Eng.)
18. Shuaiying Cao. Chinese Frontier Politics. Journal of Borderlands Studies, vol. 34, pp. 145–146, 2019. DOI: 10.1080/08865655.2017.1294496. (in Eng.)
19. Wu Shangli. Several Issues on the Development of Cultural Resources in the Border Areas. Regional Cultural Study, vol. 4, pp. 63–70, 2020. (in Eng.)
20. Xu Wenyan, Zhao Jingwei, Ye Li. Culture is new nature: comparing the restorative capacity of cultural and natural landscapes. International Journal of Environmental Studies, vol. 75, pp. 847–865, 2018. DOI: 10.1080/00207233.2018.1426311. (in Eng.)
21. Zhang Yi.Analysis of the Countermeasures of Heilongjiang Province’s Integrated Development of Cultural and Tourism Industries in the Border Areas of Russia. The Border Economy and Culture, vol. 7, pp. 7–8, 2020. (in Eng.)
22. Zhu Yingyu. An Economic Model for Studying the Role of Cultural Industries on Social Development in Cross-border Contexts. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, vol. 56, pp. 1581–1600, 2020. DOI: 10.1080/1540496X.2019.1703106. (in Eng.)
23. Zuenko I. Russia-China Cooperation: A View from the Region. Russian Politics and Law, vol. 57, pp. 1–17, 2020. DOI: 10.1080/10611940.2020.1835069. (in Eng.)
24. 胡迪. 东北边疆文化发展中的挑战及对策 = Hu Di. Challenges and Countermeasures in the Development of Northeast Frontier Culture. 经济师. 2021年. 第7期. 第116–117页. (In Chin.) (in Eng.)
25. 马红, 范会敏, 曹馨月. 中俄边境跨文化教育合作的现状与实践 = Ma Hong, Fan Huimin, Cao Xinyue. The Status Quo and Practice of Cross-Cultural Education Cooperation on the Sino-Russian Border. 湖北开放职业学院学报. 2021年. 第4期. 第 100-101 页. (In Chin.)
26. 孙晶. 边境口岸城市的城市文化特征及其品质提升研究–以满洲里为例 = Sun Jing. Research on the Urban Cultural Characteristics and Quality Improvement of Border Port Cities – Taking Manzhouli as an Example. 汉江师范学院学报. 2021 年. 第2期. 第47–52页. (In Chin.)
27. 古燕, 张海云. \"一带一路\"背景下边境口岸文化旅游发展与国家形象构建关系研究–以满洲里为例\" = Gu Yan, Zhang Haiyun. Research on the Relationship Between the Development of Cultural Tourism at Border Ports and the Construction of National Image in the Context of \"One Belt One Road\" initiative – Taking Manzhouli as an Example. 青藏高原论坛.2021 年. 第1期. 第42–47页. (In Chin.)
28. 张毅. 黑龙江省对俄边境地区文旅产业融合发展的对策分析 = Zhang Yi. Analysis of the Countermeasures of Heilongjiang Province’s Integrated Development of Cultural and Tourism Industries in the Border Areas of Russia. 边疆经济与文化. 2020年.第7期. 第7-8页. (In Chin.)
29. 黑龙江省边境管理条例 = Heilongjiang Province Border Management Regulations. Web. 24.08.2023. https://flk.npc.gov.cn/detail2.html?ZmY4MDgwODE2ZWIxYWZiODAxNmVjMDQyM2MxMDc1MDA%3D. (In Chin.)
30. 内蒙古自治区边境管理条例 = Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Border Management Regulations. Web. 23.08.2023. https://flk.npc.gov.cn/detail2.html?NDAyOGFiY2M2MTI3Nzc5MzAxNjEyODU3ODBiZTE2ZDI%3D. (In Chin.)
|
