| Article |
|---|
| Article name |
Digital ineQuality in the EU Through the Prism of EU Member States’ Strategies and Their Position in International Rankings |
| Authors |
Tislenko M.I. postgraduate, tislenko-mi@rudn.ruKholina V.N. candidate of geographical sciences, associate professor, kholina-vn@rudn.ru |
| Bibliographic description |
Tislenko M. I., Kholina V. N. Digital inequality in the EU through the prism of EU member states’ strategies and their position in international rankings // Transbaikal State University Journal. 2023. Vol. 29, no. 2. P. 121–130. DOI: 10.21209/2227-9545-2023-29-2-121-130. |
| Category |
Economy |
| DOI |
330.3 |
| DOI |
10.21209/2227-9245-2023-29-2-121-130 |
| Article type |
|
| Annotation |
This article analyzes the spatial aspects of the digital inequality in the EU and
its impact on the competitiveness of its members. The object of the study is the strategic
planning documents of the EU countries in the context of the digital inclusion/
inclusion stimulation agenda. The subject of the research is the digital inequality of
the EU countries through the prism of their positions in the international ratings of
digitalization and competitiveness. The aim of the study is to assess the relationship
between the target indicators of digitalization level in the national strategies of the EU countries (in the aspect of reducing the digital divide between countries) and
their competitiveness, which is assessed through the positions of countries in the
international rankings of the World Economic Forum and the Institute for Management
Development. The objectives of the study included the development of criteria
and approaches for the analysis of strategic planning documents of EU countries;
analysis of digital transformation strategies and economic recovery and resilience
plans of EU countries for the place of the agenda to combat the digital divide / stimulate
digital equality, as well as comparing the obtained evaluations of strategies with
international benchmarks of competitiveness and digital transformation. The results
of the study showed that the digital divide agenda has the highest priority in Ireland,
Luxembourg and France. In addition, the author’s classification of the digital competitiveness
of the EU countries, considering the policies to promote digital equality, was
formed, according to which the most competitive countries in terms of digitalization
are Denmark, the Netherlands and Ireland, and the least competitive are Slovakia,
Hungary and Croatia. Thus, the hypothesis was confirmed: the more competitive EU
countries prioritize the agenda of combating the digital divide more than the “catching
up” EU members in terms of competitiveness. Moreover, the four groups of countries
in the EU identified according to the classification confirm the idea of imbalances
within the EU along the north-west-south-east lines, with the exceptions being Austria,
Portugal and Estonia. |
| Key words |
digital inequality, digitaldivide, digital economy, digitaltransformation, digitalizationstrategies, internationalcompetitiveness rating, EUNext Generation program,economic sustainability,spatial inequality, EuropeanUnion |
| Article information |
|
| References |
1. Blanutsa V. I. Cartographic representation of the digital inequality in a global array of journal articles.
Transbaikal State University Journal, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 6–16, 2022. (In Rus.).
2. Volchenko O. V. Dynamics of digital inequality in Russia. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya:
Ekonomicheskie i sotsialnye peremeny, vol. 5, pp. 163–182, 2016. (In Rus.).
3. Safiullin A. R., Moiseeva O. A. Digital inequality: Russia and the world countries in the fourth industrial
revolution. π-Economy, vol. 12, no 6, pp. 26–37, 2019. (In Rus.).
4. Revinova S. Yu., Lazanyuk I. V. Digital Inequality in Russia: Implications for Education. Biznes.
Obrazovanie. Ekonomika: International Conference, Minsk, 7–8 April. 2022. Conference Proceedings ed. by
V. V. Mankevich at all. Minsk: Business Institute of Belarussian State University, 2022. (In Rus.).
5. Revinova S.Yu., Kaysarova T. S. E-commerce in the Context of Digital Inequality of World Regions.
Voprosy innovatsionnoy ekonomiki, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 2001–2020, 2022. (In Rus.).
6. Council and the European Commission et al. eEurope 2005: An Information Society for All. Action Plan
prepared for the European Council. 2002. Web. 27.10.2022. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.
do?uri=COM:2002:0263:FIN:EN:PDF. (In Eng.).
7. De Fontenay A., Beltran F. Inequality and economic growth: Should we be concerned by the digital
divide. International Telecommunications Society, vol. 17, 2008. Web. 21.01.2023. https://www.researchgate.
net/scientific-contributions/Alain-Bourdeau-de-Fontenay-81915384. (In Eng.).
8. DESI by components. European Commission, official website. Web. 27.10.2022. https://digital-agendadata.
eu/charts/desi-components#. (In Eng.).
9. European Commission. NextGenerationEU. European Commission, official website, 2021. Web.
27.10.2022. https://europa.eu/next-generation-eu/index_en. (In Eng.).
10. Hargittai E. The digital divide and what to do about it. New economy handbook, vol. 2003, pp. 821–
839, 2003. (In Eng.).
11. IMD World Competitiveness Booklet 2022. International Institute for Management Development,
official website. Web. 27.10.2022. https://www.imd.org/centers/world-competitiveness-center/rankings/worldcompetitiveness.
(In Eng.).
12. IMD World Digital Competitiveness Booklet 2022. International Institute for Management Development:
official website. Web. 27.10.2022. https://www.imd.org/centers/world-competitiveness-center/rankings/worlddigital-
competitiveness (In Eng.).
13. James J. Are changes in the digital divide consistent with global equality or inequality? The Information
Society, vol. 27. no. 2. pp. 121–128, 2011.
14. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. Understanding the Digital Divide. Paris:
OECD. 2001. Web. 27.10.2022. https://www.oecd.org/sti/1888451.pdf. (In Eng.).
15. Qiang C. Z. W., Rossotto C. M., Kimura K. Economic impacts of broadband. Information and
communications for development 2009: Extending reach and increasing impact, vol. 3, pp. 35–50, 2009. (In
Eng.).
16. Schwab K. The global competitiveness report 2019. World Economic Forum. 2019, vol. 9, no. 10. Web.
27.10.2023. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_TheGlobalCompetitivenessReport2019.pdf. (In Eng.).
17. Srinuan C., Bohlin E. Understanding the digital divide: A literature survey and ways forward. Innovative
ICT Applications – Emerging Regulatory, Economic and Policy Issues: 22nd European Regional Conference of the International Telecommunications Society (ITS): Budapest, Hungary 18th-21st September, pp. 1–38, 2011.
Web. 21.01.23. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254460217_Understanding_the_digital_divide_A_
literature_survey_and_ways_forward. (In Germ.).
18. Strategie Künstliche Intelligenz (KI–Strategie) der Bundesregierung. Bundesministerium für Bildung
und Forschung, offizielle Webseite. Web. 27.10.2022. https://www.bmbf.de/bmbf/shareddocs/downloads/files/
nationale_ki-strategie.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=1. (In Germ.). |
| Full article | Digital ineQuality in the EU Through the Prism of EU Member States’ Strategies and Their Position in International Rankings |
