| Annotation |
The object of research of the article is the territory of the East Siberian geocon.
The subject of the article is deposits of combustible minerals. The purpose of the
article is to show the presence of a certain spatial relationship in the location of oil,
gas, and coal deposits with the location of tectonic concentric structures fixed on
the Earth’s surface by satellite data on the territory of the East Siberian region (East
Siberian Geocon). A separate task of the article is an attempt to separate all tectonic
concentric structures by diametrical dimensions, geological age of formation of rocks
of their crystalline basement and the relationship of these structures with deposits of
combustible minerals. As methods, methods of decoding satellite images and aeromagnetic
methods were used to isolate tectonic concentric structures in the relief of
surface and deeper layers of the Earth. The methodology of the search for deposits
of combustible minerals is associated with the spatial and deep interrelation of tectonic
concentric structures and the ancient mantle plumes forming them – sources
of degassing of hydrocarbon fluids. As a result, a system of classification of spatial
dimensions of all major types of tectonic concentric structures was developed based
on numerous statistical measurements. In particular, it has been revealed that certain
types of mineral deposits are confined to tectonic concentric structures. As an area
of application, it can be assumed that the peripheral spatial location of large oil, gas,
bitumen, and coal deposits is predicted relative to the central part of the Precambrian
mantle plumes of the East Siberian region, forming tectonic concentric structures similar
to the Kureyskoy and Enisey-Khatangskoy tectonic concentric structures, where
oil and gas fields are concentrated and the Nizhne-Tungusskoy tectonic concentric
structure, where coal deposits are concentrated. |
| Key words |
forecasting methodology,
hydrocarbon deposits, mantle
plumes, tectonic concentric
structures, East Siberian
geocon, potential resources
of combustible minerals,
tectonic concentric structures,
East Siberian region, oil
and gas fields, combustible
minerals |
| References |
1. Ananyeva E. M., Belyaev I. V., Golovin I. V. Scheme of deep fault zones of the USSR territory, scale
1:10 000 000. Leningrad: VSEGEI, 1977. (In Rus.).
2. Valyaev B. M. Hydrocarbon degassing of the Earth, geotectonics and the origin of oil and gas (recognition
and development of the ideas of P. N. Kropotkin). Degassing of the Earth and the genesis of oil and gas fields.
Moscow: GEOS, 2011. (In Rus.).
3. Volvovsky I. S., Volvovsky B. S. Sections of the Earth’s crust of the territory of the USSR according to
deep seismic sounding. Moscow: Soviet Radio, 1975. (In Rus.).
4. Zakirov A.Sh., Kharitonov A. L. Deep structure and prospects of oil and gas potential of the Northern
Ustyurt. The electronic magazine “Deep oil”, vol. 2, no. 11, pp. 1759–1771, 2014. (In Rus.).
5. Karnyushina E. E., Korobova N. I., Frolov S. V., Bakai E. A., Akhmanov G. G., Krylov O. V. Sedimentation
control of the petroleum properties of the Vendian-Cambrian formations of the north of the Lena-Tunguska
basin. Geo resources, no. 2, pp. 28–40, 2015. (In Rus.).
6. Kartashov S. V. Map of minerals of the territory of the USSR. Scale 1:10 000 000. Moscow: VSEGEI,
1990. (In Rus.).
7. Katz Ya. G., Tevelev A. V., Sulidi-Kondratiev E. D. Ring structures of the face of the planet. Moscow:
Znanie, 1989. (In Rus.).
8. Solovyov V. V. Map of structures of the central type of the territory of the USSR. Scale 1:10 000 000: will
explain. note. Leningrad: VSEGEI, 1982. (In Rus.).
9. Serumkin V. L. Deep degassing of the Earth and global catastrophes. Moscow: Geoinformcenter, 2002.
(In Rus.).
10. Khain V. E. The main problems of modern geology. Moscow: Scientific world, 2003. (In Rus.).
11. Shein V. S., Alferenok A. V., Kalamkarov S. L., Knipper A. A., Shein V. A. Tectonic structure and oil
and gas potential of the foundation of the Western Arctic and adjacent regions. Geology of oil and gas, no. 6,
pp. 5–29, 2017. (In Rus.).
12. Harp K. S., Weis D. Insights into the origins and compositions of mantle plumes: A comparison of
Galápagos and Hawaii. G3: Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, vol. 21, no. 9, 2020. Web 21.10.2022.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342 404151_Insights_Into_the_Origins_and_Compositions_of_
Mantle_Plumes_A_Comparison_of_Galapagos_and_Hawai’ i. (In Eng.).
13. Heron P. J. Mantle plumes and mantle dynamics in the Wilson cycle. Geological Society Special
Publication, vol. 470, no 1, pp. 87–103, 2019. (In Eng.).
14. Koppers A. A. P., Konrad K., Becker T. W., Jackson M. G., Müller R. D., Romanowicz B., Steinberger
B., Whittaker J. M. Mantle plumes and their role in earth processes. Nature reviews Earth and Environment,
vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 382–401, 2021. (In Eng.). |
