Article
Article name OPTIONS FOR REFORMING THE TAXATION OF PRIORITY AND SOCIALLY SIGNIFICANT SECTORS OF THE ECONOMY OF THE RUSSIAN REGIONS BASED ON THE TAX BURDEN CALCULATOR
Authors Vylkova E.S. doctor of economic sciences, professor, vylkova-es@ranepa.ru
Viktorova N.. doctor of economic sciences, associate professor, viktorova_ng@spbstu.ru
Naumov V.. doctor of military sciences, candidate of technical sciences, naumov-vn@ranepa.ru
Pokrovskaia N.V. candidate of economic sciences, n.pokrovskaia@spbu.ru
Bibliographic description
Category Economics
DOI 336.2
DOI 10.21209/2227-9245-2022-28-9-62-72
Article type
Annotation We made an analysis of the total tax burden and average salary in St. Petersburg for 2020 based on the scale of companies and types of economic activity, with a focus on priority and socially significant sectors of the economy. The object of the study is priority and socially important sectors of the economy of the Russian regions. The subject of study is economic relations in the process of taxation of enterprises of priority and socially important sectors of the economy of St. Petersburg. The study has been carried out in order to justify the reform of tax measures to support selected sectors using data from the official digital resource of the Federal Tax Service of the Russian Federation. The tasks are solved on the basis of modeling in the STATA program, where the dependent variables characterizing state support for priority and socially significant sectors are the tax burden and the average salary. The study is based on the method of dispersion analysis. A two-way analysis of variance of the dependence of these variables on the size of the organization and on the industry shows that the average salary depends on the size of the organization and on the sector; and the tax burden only on the type of activity. A one-way dispersion analysis of variables depending on the different scales and types of activity of companies revealed that the type of activity has an impact on the tax burden, and the relationship between the industry and the average salary is weak. To refine the results of a single-factor analysis of variance, dummy variables of the R language are used. It is revealed that the level of state support for priority and socially significant sectors is insufficient today and it is advisable to introduce additional tax preferences for them. Options for reforming the taxation of these industries are proposed: reducing the rate of mandatory payments to the system of compulsory social insurance and providing funding for the reimbursement of personal income tax paid for employees of small and medium-sized enterprises in these industries. Further research on the issues under study can be carried out by expanding time horizons; extrapolating methods and results to other domestic regions; substantiating in detail and concretizing proposals for reforming the taxation of priority and socially significant sectors of the relevant territory
Key words : tax, taxation, tax burden, average salary, region, scale of the enterprise, type of economic activity, priority industry, socially significant industry, tax burden calculator
Article information Vylkova E., Viktorova N., Naumov V., Pokrovskaya N. Options for reforming the taxation of priority and socially significant sectors of the economy of the Russian regions based on the tax burden calculator // Transbaikal state university journal, 2022, vol. 28, no. 9.рр. 62-72. DOI: 10.21209/2227-9245-2022-28-9-62-72
References 1. Berezina E.V., Balandina A.S., Belomyttseva O.S. Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie (Taxes and taxation), 2020, no. 2, pp. 18–39. 2. Muravleva T.V., Orlovskaya D.D. Ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost i kachestvo (Economic security and quality), 2019, № 3, pp. 50–54. 3. Narrativy individualnogo podohodnogo nalogooblozheniya v XXI veke. (Narratives of individual income taxation in the twenty-first century). Moscow: JuNITI-DANA, 2021. 295 p. 4. Atrostic B., Nunns J. Fifty Years of Economic Measurement: The Jubilee of the Conference on Research in Income and Wealth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991. Pp. 343–420. 5. Borisov G. V., Popova L. V. University Journal of Economic Studies. 2022. No. 38. Pp. 153–185. 6. Cantillo T., Cantillo V., Garcia L., Cantillo-Garcia V. Latin American Economic Review. 2022. Vol. 31. Pp. 1–25. 7. Carey D., Rabesona J. OECD Economic Studies. 2003. Vol. 2. Pp. 129–174. 8. Carey D., Tchilinguirian H. OECD Economics Department Working Papers 2000. No. 258. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/economy/public-finance/1885651.pdf (date of access: 21.10.2022). Text: electronic. 9. Celikay F. Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science. 2020. Vol. 25. Pp. 27–43. 10. Dang D., Fang H., He M. China Economic Review. 2019. Vol. 56. Pp. 101–103. 11. Jedrzejowicz T., Kiss G., Jirsakova J. NBP Working Papers. 2009. No. 56. Pp. 35–39. 12. Junusbekov M., Ydyrys S., Munassipova M., Almukhambetova B., Zhetibayev Z. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal. 2020. Vol.26, Iss. 2. Pp. 1–71. 13. Karminskaya T., Islamutdinov V. Economy of Region. 2021. Vol. 17, Iss. 2. Pp. 445–459. 14. Lezina T., Stoianova O., Ivanova V., Gadasina, L. Emerging Technologies and Business Innovation: lecture notes in business information processing. 2019. Vol 358. Pp. 3–14. 15. Liu Ye, Gong Jing-Wen, Yu Tao, Jin Miao. Journal of Northeastern University. 2021.Vol. 42, Iss. 2. Pp. 290–299. 16. Loubochkin M., Zasenko V. Digital Transformation on Manufacturing, Infrastructure and Service. 2020. No. 92. Pp. 1–10. 17. Lucas de Resende M. P., Borini F. M. I., Ragazzi V. Silva C. V. Competitiveness Review. 2021. Available at: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/CR-03-2021-0041/full/html (date of access: 21.10.2022). Text: electronic. 18. Mendoza E., Razin A., Tesar L. Journal of Monetary Economics. 1994. Vol. 34. Pp. 297–323. 19. Nicodeme G. Frontiers in Finance and Economics. 2007. Vol. 4. Pp. 102–131. 20. Pinskaya M., Steshenko Yu. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2021. Pp. 129–144. 21. Rodionov D. G., Konnikov E. A., Konnikova O. A. Journal of Social Sciences. 2018. Iss. 3. Pp. 277–282. 22. Shavandina I., Ilicheva O., Kutaeva T., Shamin A., Kozlov V. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. 2021. Vol. 205. Рp. 831–843. 23. Shestak, O., Shcheka, O.L. & Klochkov, Y. International Journal of Systems Assurance Engineering and Management. 2020. No. 11. P. 44–62. 24. Sung Ho. Social Science Japan Journal. 2020. Vol. 23, Iss. 1. Pp. 37–64. 25. The Taxation of Income from Capital: A Comparative Study of the United States, the United Kingdom, Sweden and West Germany. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1984. 346 p. 26. Volkov V. I., Zueva O. N., Nabokov V. I., Nekrasov K. V. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2021. Vol. 949. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357923787_Problems_of_providing_qualified_personnel_for_the_agricultural_complex_of_the_region (date of access: 21.10.2022). Text: electronic. 27. Wojtasiak-Terech A., Majerowska E. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. 2019. Pp. 237–248. 28. Zaborovskaya O., Kudryavtseva T. Zhogova E. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology. 2019. No. 9. Pp. 5065–5076.
Full articleOPTIONS FOR REFORMING THE TAXATION OF PRIORITY AND SOCIALLY SIGNIFICANT SECTORS OF THE ECONOMY OF THE RUSSIAN REGIONS BASED ON THE TAX BURDEN CALCULATOR