Article
Article name Cultural reproduction in the education system: balance of traditions and innovations in the new digital reality
Authors Namzhilova E.. postgraduate, elenasnam@gmail.com
Bibliographic description
Category Politology
DOI 304.44
DOI 10.21209/2227-9245-2022-28-8-45-56
Article type
Annotation The article is devoted to the study of existing approaches to the reproduction of culture in the education system. At present, the problems of cultural reproduction in the education system are of particular relevance due to the accelerating pace of changes in society. Unification of cultures and way of life leads to the threat of loss of traditional values along with the acquisition of new ones. In such conditions, one of the main guarantors of the traditions preservation, that is, the reproduction of traditional cultural values remains the education system. At the same time, the rapid change in the educational space associated with the digital revolution is causing changes in the role of educational institutions as a translator of traditions. All these factors actualize the development of a new approach to the reproduction of culture and its research. The object of the research is cultural reproduction in the education system; the subject of the research is the features of cultural reproduction in the education system in modern conditions. The purpose of the study is to identify possible approaches to the reproduction of cultural values in modern conditions. The research objectives are to study the main approaches to cultural reproduction in the educational system; to identify contradictions between existing approaches and the reality of the modern educational space; to determine the relevance of developing a new approach to the reproduction of culture in the educational system. Synergetic and diachronic approaches are the methodological basis of the study and allow us to analyze the processes of culture change over time. General scientific methods (theoretical analysis, systematization, generalization, analysis of sources on the topic) made it possible to identify the development of methodological approaches to the study of cultural reproduction and put forward a position on the need to develop a new approach. Having analyzed the existing methodological approaches to the study of the reproduction of culture in the education system and having studied the problem of the loss of traditional cultural values, the author proposes the development of a new approach based on the reproduction of cultural heritage in the education system in the new digital reality
Key words cultural reproduction, cultural heritage, cultural values, digital reality, educational space, digital space, education system, traditions, innovations, cultural and educational practices
Article information Namzhilova Е. Cultural reproduction in the education system: balance of traditions and innovations in the new digital reality // Transbaikal State University Journal, 2022, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 45-56. DOI: 10.21209/2227-9245-2022-28-8-45-56
References 1. Astafieva O. N., Zubanova L. B., Kirillova N. B., Nikonorova E. V., Shlykova O. V. Informatsionnaya epoha: novye paradigmy kultury i obrazovaniya (The Information Age: new paradigms of culture and education). Yekaterinburg: Ural Federal University, 2019. 292 p. 2. Bakhmann-Medik D. Kulturnye povoroty. Novye orientiry v naukah o culture (Cultural twists. New guidelines in the cultural sciences). Moscow: NLO, 2017. 504 p. 3. Burdie P., Passron Zh.-K. Vosproizvodstvo: elementy teorii sistemy obrazovaniya. Moscow: Prosveshchenie, 2007. 267 p. 4. Vanyushkina L. M., Korobkova E. N. Kulturno-obrazovatelnye praktiki: novy obrazovatelny format (Cultural and educational practices: a new educational format), 2017, no. 3. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kulturno-obrazovatelnye-praktiki-novyy-obrazovatelnyy-format (date of access: 28.08.2022). Text: electronic. 5. Veber A. B. Sotsiologicheskaya nauka i sotsialnaya praktika (Sociological science and social practice), 2017, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 47–62. 6. Gomboeva M. I. Hudozhestvennoe obrazovanie: tradicii, trendy, perspektivy (Art education: traditions, trends, prospects). Chita: Transbaikal State University, 2014. Pp. 27–40. 7. Danilov A. N. Sotsialnye praktiki i razvitie gorodskoi sredy: urbanistika i innovatika (Social practices and development of urban sredy: urbanism and innovation). Minsk: BSU, 2021. Pp. 97–103. Available at: https://elib.bsu.by/handle/123456789/272378 (date of access: 28.08.2022). Text: electronic. 8. Zhukova E. D. Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie v Rossii (Pedagogical education in Russia), 2017, no. 6, pp. 151–155. 9. Zakharova E. Yu., Zasukhina V. N., Gordeeva N. S. Uchenye zapiski Zabaykalskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta (Scientific notes of the Transbaikal State University), 2016, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 6–14. 10. Koval E. A. Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kulturologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki (Historical, philosophical, political and legal sciences, cultural studies and art criticism. Questions of theory and practice), 2012, no. 8, ch. 1, pp. 95–98. 11. Koval E. A. Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kulturologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki (Historical, philosophical, political and legal sciences, cultural studies and art criticism. Questions of theory and practice), 2016, no. 3, ch. 2, pp. 83–87. 12. Korennaya V. S. Nasledie vekov (The legacy of centuries), 2020, no. 4, pp. 64–71. Available at: http://heritage-magazine.com/index.php/HC/article/view/403/330 (date of access: 20.08.2022). Text: electronic. 13. Marks K. Kapital: Kritika politicheskoy ekonomii (Capital: criticism of political economy). Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe izdatelstvo politicheskoy literatury, 1952. 797 p. 14. Mid M. Kultura i mir detstva (Culture and the world of childhood). Moscow: Nauka, 1988. 429 p. 15. Saurov Yu. A., Uvarova M. P. Kontsept (Concept), 2019, no. 1. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/obrazovanie-kak-konstruirovanie-realnosti-myshleniya-i-deyatelnosti-k-90-letiyu-g-p-schedrovitskogo (date of access: 16.08.2022). Text: electronic. 16. Seliverstova N. A. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie (Knowledge. Understanding. Ability), 2012, no. 3. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kulturnoe-vosproizvodstvo-voprosy-metodologii-i-metodiki-issledovaniya (date of access: 2.08.2022). Text: electronic. 17. Flier A. Ya. Izbrannye raboty po teorii kultury (Selected works on the theory of culture). Moscow: Soglasie, 2014. 556 p. 18. Flier A.Ya. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta kul\'tury i iskusstv (Bulletin of the Moscow State University of Culture and Arts), 2016, no. 5. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kulturnaya-politika-i-strategii-kulturnyh-vzaimodeystviy (date of access: 20.08.2022). Text: electronic. 19. Khantington S. Stolknovenie tsivilizatsii (Clash of Civilizations). Moscow: AST, 2003. 868 p. 20. Cherednichenko G. A. Obrazovanie i sotsialnaya differentsiatsiya (Education and social differentiation). Moscow: Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki, 2018. Pp. 63–82. 21. Shapinskaya, E. N. Kultura i obrazovanie: nauchno-informatsionnyi zhurnal vuzov kultury i iskusstv (Culture and education: scientific and informational journal of universities of culture and Arts), 2016, no. 4. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/rol-kulturnogo-naslediya-v-obrazovanii-i-vospitanii-rossiyskoy-molodyozhi (date of access: 28.08.2022). Text: electronic. 22. Shapovalova G. M. Territoriya novyh vozmozhnostey. Vestnik Vladivostokskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta ekonomiki i servisa (The territory of new opportunities. Bulletin of the Vladivostok State University of Economics and Service.), 2017, no. 4. Pp. 159–168. 23. Shestakova, I. G. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta (Bulletin of the Voronezh State University), 2019, no. 3, pp. 90–97. 24. Shlykova O.V. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta kultury i iskusstv (Bulletin of the Moscow State University of Culture and Arts), 2020, no. 5, pp. 160–169. 25. Shtompka P. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya (Sociological research), 2001, no. 1, pp. 6–16. 26. Bryan A. The New Digital Storytelling: Creating Narratives with New Media Santa Barbara: Praeger, 2011. 277 p. 27. Holloway S. L., Pimlott-Wilson H. (2019). Schools, Families, and Social Reproduction // Geographies of Schooling. Knowledge and Space, 2019, vol. 14. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18799-6_14 (date of access: 28.08.2022). Text: electronic 28. Jæger M. M., Breen R. American Journal of Sociology, 2016, vol. 121, no. 4. pp. 1079–1115. Available at: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/684012?mobileUi=0&journalCode=ajs (date of access: 28.08.2022). Text: electronic. 29. Patterson O. Handbook of Cultural Sociology. New York: Routledge, 2010. pp. 139–151. Available at: https://scholar.harvard.edu/patterson/publications/mechanisms-cultural-reproduction-explaining-puzzle-persistence (date of access: 28.08.2022). Text: electronic.
Full articleCultural reproduction in the education system: balance of traditions and innovations in the new digital reality