Article
Article name EDUCATION, PERSONNEL AND INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT OF THE FAR EASTERN FEDERAL DISTRICT: A PROBLEMATIC ISSUE
Authors Tomskikh A.A. doctor of geographical sciences, associate professor, tomskih_aa@mail.ru
Bibliographic description
Category Economics
DOI 334.02
DOI 10.21209/2227-9245-2022-28-5-110-119
Article type
Annotation The article deals with the problems of staffing the economy of the regions of the Far Eastern Federal District. In recent decades, the situation has been aggravated by intensive youth migration from the region. At the level of the federal center, the solution of problems is seen through the use of the tools of the program method laid down in the project \"Priority 2030. The Far East\". The programmatic approach has dominated in the decisions of authorities at all levels for several decades. However, programs are not always executed. This is especially evident in the development programs of the Far Eastern Federal District of different years. In the presented program, a special mission is assigned to the system of vocational education in the region, primarily higher education, which, according to the developers of the document, should become a point of growth of the stated priorities. The author examines the problems of the regions and universities, in solving the problems he concludes about the inconsistency of the cluster approach tools in the system \"production – education – science – innovation/science – business – state». Comparative analysis has shown that the promising economic specializations stated in the \"Spatial Development Strategy of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2030\" and university projects are poorly correlated with each other. At the same time, the sectoral and territorial cluster approach has proven itself well in different countries of the world. The latter does not allow considering the conceived projects of universities potentially effective in terms of invested funds and efforts in the development of the Far Eastern Federal District. The designated tasks of staffing the Far Eastern Federal District and migration outflow before the vocational education system cannot be solved without a radical change in approaches to the implementation of the mechanism for building relations in the system \"business – state – science – education\". It should be based on the sectoral and territorial cluster approach, implemented taking into account promising directions of the scientific and technological development of the country, platforms of the National Technological Initiative and the innovative development of the regions. Otherwise, the goals and tasks of the program \"Priority 2030. The Far East\" will remain unfulfilled in terms of securing young personnel
Key words Keywords: personnel, youth migration, vocational education, industry cluster, territorial cluster, scientific and educational cluster, Far Eastern Federal District, economy of the region, authorities, young personnel
Article information Tomsk/kh А. Education, Personnel And Innovative Development Of The Far Eastern Federal District: A Problematic Issue //Transbaikal State University Journal, 2022, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 110-119. DOI: 10.21209/2227-9245-2022- 28-5-110-119.
References 1. Abashkin V. L., Abdrakhmanova G. I., Bredikhin S. V. Reyting innovatsionnogo razvitiya subyektov Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Vyp. 7 / pod red. L. M. Gokhberga (Rating of innovative development of subjects of the Russian Federation. Issue. 7 / ed. L. M. Gokhberg). Moscow: NRU HSE, 2021. 274 p. 2. Dezhina I. G., Kiseleva V. V. Gosudarstvo, nauka i biznes v innovatsionnoy sisteme Rossii (State, science and business in the innovation system of Russia). Moscow: IEPP, 2008. 225 p. 3. Dezhina I. G., Kiseleva V. V. Voprosy ekonomiki (Questions of Economics), 2007, no. 12, рр. 9–11. 4. Nedeshev A. A. Oblastnoy ekonomicheskiy rayon (issledovaniye funktsiy, struktury i protsessov razvitiya na primere Chitinskoy oblasti) (Regional economic region (research of functions, structure and development processes on the example of the Chita region). Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1975, р. 163. 5. Khospers Gert-Yan, Deroshe P\'yer, Sote Frederik. International Entrepreneurship Management Journal (International Entrepreneurship Management Journal), 2009, vol. 5, p. 285–299. Available at: http://www.vechnayamolodost.ru/pages/investiciiivenchur/geoklipogo49.html (date of access: 03/19/2022). Text: electronic. 6. Etzkowitz Henry, Leydesdorff Loet. The Triple Helix University – Industry – Government Relations: A Laboratory for Knowledge Based Economic Development. Rochester (The Triple Helix University – Industry – Government Relations: A Laboratory for Knowledge Based Economic Development. Rochester). NY, 1995-01-01. SSRN 2480085. 7. Etzkowitz Henry. Institutet för Studier av Utbildningoch Forsknings institut (Institutet för Studier av Utbildningoch Forsknings institute). 2002–2011. 8. Florax R. Twente: Centre for higher education policy studies; University of Twente (Twente: Centre for higher education policy studies; University of Twente), 1987, р. 56. 9. Leydesdorff Loet. University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam School of Communications Research (University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam School of Communications Research), 2012. arXiv:1201.4553. Bibcode:2012arXiv1201.4553L. 10. Leydesdorff Loet, Lawton Smith, Helen. The Triple Helix in the context of global change: dynamics and challenges (The Triple Helix in the context of global change: dynamics and challenges). Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/signup.SignUp.html (date of access: 03/19/2022). Text: electronic. 11. Schwab Klaus. The Fourth Industrial Revolution (The Fourth Industrial Revolution). Ginebra: World Economic Forum, 2016, 172 p.
Full articleEDUCATION, PERSONNEL AND INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT OF THE FAR EASTERN FEDERAL DISTRICT: A PROBLEMATIC ISSUE