| Annotation |
Financial inclusion, considered as the provision of financial opportunities and access of the rural population and small forms of management (SFM) to financial and credit resources, is an important factor that allows an agricultural business to expand, create jobs and reduce inequality in the village. The subject of the study is financial and credit tools that provide financial inclusion of the SFM in agriculture. The purpose of the study is to assess the state and development problems of financial inclusion of small agricultural producers, as well as determining directions and economic measures that contribute to its increase in order to ensure sustainable development of rural areas. Research methods. The study has been carried out using such general scientific methods as: analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction, abstract-logical method. The empirical base of the study is based on the data of the Ministry of Agriculture of Russia, the Federal State Statistics Service, the Central Bank of the Russian Federation. Research results. SFM and the economy of the population are manufacturers of a significant share of agricultural products and provide employment in the village. However, such a necessary preferential lending for a number of reasons remains for them inaccessible and insufficient for the development of agricultural production. One of the alternative sources of borrowed funds for small agribusiness and the population is agricultural credit consumer cooperation (ACCC). The growth of the portfolio of loans of the ACCC indicates their demand in rural territories. However, the presence of a number of accumulated problems of the institutional, organizational and economic nature led to a reduction in the number of rural credit cooperatives. Based on the results of the study, directions and economic measures are proposed to increase the financial availability of preferential lending for the SFM and the development of ACCC |
| References |
1. Adzhemoglu D., Robinson Dzh. A. Pochemu odni strany bogatye, a drugie bednye. Proishozhdenie vlasti, procvetanija i nishhety (Why nations fail. The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty). Moscow: AST, 2016, 770 p.
2. Baetova D. R., Zagorenko A. A. Azimut nauchnyh issledovaniy: ekonomika i upravlenie (Azimuth of Scientific Research: Economics and Administration), 2020, vol. 9, no. 3, рр. 85–88. DOI: 10.26140/anie-2020-0903-0018.
3. Isaeva O. V. Nauchny zhurnal Rossiyskogo NII problem melioratsii (Scientific Journal of the Russian Research Institute of Land Reclamation Problems), 2021, vol. 11, no. 2, рр. 234–254. DOI: 10.31774/2222-1816-2021-11-2-234-254.
4. Isaeva O. V., Udalov A. A. Vestnik Donskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta (Bulletin of the Don State Agrarian University), 2019, no. 2-1, рр. 75–82.
5. Lyasnikov N. V. Ekonomika i sotsium: sovremennye modeli razvitiya (Economics and society: contemporary models of development), 2018, vol. 8, no. 3, рр. 24–35.
6. Maksimov A. F., Khudyakova E. V. Fundamentalnye i prikladnye issledovaniya kooperativnogo sektora ekonomiki (Fundamental and applied research studies of the economics cooperative sector), 2020, no. 4, рр. 87–94. DOI: 10.37984/2076-9288-2020-4-87-94.
7. Ogarkova N. N. Vestnik Kurskoy gosudarstvennoy selskohozyaystvennoy akademii (Bulletin of the Kursk State Agricultural Academy), 2018, no. 8, рр. 283–287.
8. Perspektivy razvitiya kreditnoy kooperatsii v Lipetskoy oblasti obsudili uchastniki biznes-foruma (Prospects for the development of credit cooperation in the Lipetsk region were discussed by the participants of the business forum). Available at: https://donvesti.ru/news/34580 (date of access: 06/24/2021). Text: electronic.
9. Petrikov A. V. Fundamentalnye i prikladnye issledovaniya kooperativnogo sektora ekonomiki (Fundamental and applied research studies of the economics cooperative sector), 2017, no. 4, P. 3–5.
10. Podgorskaya S.V. Nauchnoe obozrenie: teoriya i praktika (Science review: theory and practice), 2021, vol. 11, no. 1, рр. 261–275. DOI: 10.32417/1997-4868-2021-211-08-75-87.
11. Tarasov A. N., Isaeva O. V., Kholodova M. A. Organizatsionno-ekonomicheskiy mehanizm razvitiya razlichnyh form hozyaystvovaniya v agrarnom sektore APK v usloviyah novoy ekonomicheskoy realnosti (Organizational and economic mechanism of development of various forms of management in the agricultural sector of the agro-industrial complex in the conditions of the new economic reality). Rostov-on-Don, ARRIEaS – branch of the FSBSI FRARC; Publishing house of AzovPrint LLC, 2020, 264 p.
12. Uzun V. Ya. Nikonovskie chteniya (Nikonovsky readings), 2019, no. 24, рр. 15–20.
13. Kholodov O. A., Kholodova M. A. Vestnik Donskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta (Bulletin of the Don State Agrarian University), 2018, no. 4-2 (30), рр. 129–137.
14. Corrado G., Corrado L. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability (Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability), February 2017, vol. 24, рр. 19–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.01.013.
15. Danilov Yu., Pivovarov D. SSRN Electronic Journal (SSRN Electronic Journal), 2019. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3354539.
16. Oostendorp R., van Asseldonk M., Gathiaka J., Mulwa R., Radeny M., Recha J., Wattel C., van Wesenbeeck L. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability (Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability), 2019, vol. 41, рр. 18–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.09.014.
17. Saji T. G. Indian Journal of Economics and Development (Indian Journal of Economics and Development), Vol. 15, no. 3, July-September, 2019, Pp. 410-417. DOI: 10.5958/2322-0430.2019.00051.9.
18. Tartaruga I. G. P. Handbook of Research on Cultural Heritage and Its Impact on Territory Innovation and Development (Handbook of Research on Cultural Heritage and Its Impact on Territory Innovation and Development), edited by Lídia Oliveira, et al., IGI Global, 2021, P. 62-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-
|
