Article
Article name Development of a model for making rational management decisions with an optimal ratio of risk distribution
Authors Zhao W.. ,
Beregova G.. ,
Bibliographic description
Category Economics
DOI 338.22.021.4
DOI 10.21209/2227-9245-2022-28-2-120-129
Article type
Annotation 文章提出了博弈论的原理，分析了公方和私方之间的静态和动态玩法，建立了风险分配方案和风险分配比例。 业投资项目、决策模型和确定模型最优解的特点。 提出了基于多重收益的投资项目风险分配分析和单边风险接受模型，并确定了投资项目的初步风险分配方案。 建立具有最优风险分配比例的决策模型，得到Nash模型的最优均衡解，确定最优风险分配比例。 结果表明，在工程项目风险分配的静态博弈中，风险偏好和参与者控制风险的能力决定了一个初步的风险分配计划。 文章提出了国家改善投资项目的法律环境、采取措施降低替代成本和交易成本、降低谈判损失系数以实现双赢等建议。 与此同时，人们认为公共部门应该创造一种公平有序的合作氛围。 举办这些活动将增加私人方参与项目的热情。 私人方需要了解公共部门开展项目的目的和使命，并通过多种渠道和方法积极与公共部门沟通，降低信息不对称程度，降低自身谈判成本。 文章考虑了建立第三方机构提供项目风险评估和风险分配咨询服务的可能性，并建立了灵活的风险分配和重新谈判机制，以确保管理决策的合理性。
Key words Keywords: 工业基础设施、投资项目、博弈论、风险分配.
Article information Zhao Wenfu, Beregova G. Development of a model for making rational management decisions with an optimal ratio of risk distribution // Transbaikal State University Journal, 2022, vol. 28, no. 2, pp 120-129. .DOI: 10.21209/2227-9245-2022-28-2-120-129
References 1. Baranov A. O., Muzyko Ye. I., Pavlov V. N. Finansy: teoriya i praktika (Finance: theory and practice), 2017, pp. 120–132. 2. Zholonko T. O. Zhurnal upravleniya riskami i finansami (Journal of risk management and finance), 2021, no. 78. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14020078 (Date of access: 01/17/2022). Text: electronic. 3. Klimovets O. V., Zubakin V. A. Strategicheskiye resheniya i risk-menedzhment (Strategic decisions and risk management), 2016, no. 2, рр. 78–84. 4. Klipin A. O. Perspektivy razvitiya fundamentalnyh nauk: materialy XVI Mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii studentov, aspirantov i molodyh uchenyh (Prospects for the development of fundamental sciences: Proceedings of the XVI International Conference of students, postgraduates and young scientists). Tomsk: Tomsk State University, 2019, pp. 84–86. 5. Kovalev P. P. Azimut nauchnyh issledovaniy: ekonomika i upravleniye (Azimuth of scientific research: economics and management), 2017, vol.6, no.. 3, pp. 182–185. 6. Lin Kh., Li F. Academic Frontiers (Academic Frontiers), 2019, no. 1, pp. 100–103. 7. Mamiy Ye. A., Yakhimovich Ye. S. Ekonomika i biznes: teoriya i praktik (Economics and business: theory and practice), 2018, pp. 1–6. 8. Mukhammad A. R. I., Nor I. D., Ku M. N. K. Zhurnal fiziki. Seriya konferentsiy. 2021. T. 1988. Simpozium Kebangsaan Sayns Matematik ke-28 (SKSM28) (28–29 iyulya 2021 g., Kuantan, Pakhang)(Journal of Physics. Series of conferences), 2021, vol. 1988. Kebangsaan Science Symposium Mathematician ke-28 (SKSM28) (July 28–29, 2021, Kuantan, Pahang). Available at: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1988/1/012056/meta (Date of access 01/17/2022). Text: electronic. 9. Nazarova Yu. N. Mir nauki, kultury, obrazovaniya (World of science, culture, education), 2016, no. 2, рр. 314–316. 10. Nyuton D. Igry (Games), 2018, no. 9, рр. 31–43. 11. Piravinan M. Matematika (Mathematics), 2019, no. 7, рр. 858–867. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/math7090858 (Date of access 01/17/2022). Text: electronic. 12. Pozharskaya G. I., Molodetskaya S. F. Voprosy upravleniya (Management issues), 2018, pp. 91–97. 13. Syaovey Ts., Khaytszyun V. Universitet nauki i tekhniki Khuachzhun Ukhan (Huazhong Wuhan University of Science and Technology), 2020, no. 7, pp. 1–10. 14. Kha Tkhi Min Khue. Izvestiya Tulskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomicheskiye i yuridicheskiye nauki (News of the Tula State University. Economic and legal sciences), 2018, pp. 1–7. 15. Chzhou Ch., Chzhan S., Chzhan P. China Soft Science (China Soft Science), 2015, no. 9, рр. 82–95.
Full articleDevelopment of a model for making rational management decisions with an optimal ratio of risk distribution