| Annotation |
This article is devoted to modern approaches to stimulating innovative development within the framework of industrial policy implemented in the developed countries of the West and Russia in the conditions of scientific, technical and digital transformation of the world economy. It is noted that in Western countries there are different approaches to stimulating the scientific and technical development of industry, the development and introduction of innovations in the production process, differing in the degree of state intervention in the economy, the peculiarities of the problems and tasks solved by each country, a specific set of tools used. At the same time, the overall goal of the policy is similar in different countries: to increase the innovation, dynamism and competitiveness of the national industry. It is also noted that in recent years, the Russian Federation has adopted a number of legislative and regulatory documents aimed at supporting innovations in industry, which use Western experience and, to a large extent, are focused on direct support from the state. Based on the analysis of statistical data and comparison with the indicators of Western countries, an assessment of the effectiveness and efficiency of the measures taken in Russia is given and it is concluded that the measures taken at the moment have not had a significant impact on the acceleration of scientific and technological development and innovative restructuring in the branches of Russian industry. The final part contains a set of proposals on various areas of state policy in the field of stimulating innovative development, including those related to the organization of effective cooperation between scientific organizations and industrial enterprises, cluster development, and macroeconomic measures to support innovation. |
| References |
1.Antipin I. A. Universum: Ekonomika i yurisprudentsiya (Universum: Economics and jurisprudence), 2017, no. 2.
2.Aristarkhova M. K., Abzgildin D. A. Yevraziyskoye nauchnoye obyedineniye (Eurasian scientific association), 2019, no. 1, рр. 237–243.
3. Bolshakov A. K., Klishko S. A. Vestnik IE RAN (Bulletin of IE RAS), 2016, no. 3, рр. 92-105.
4. Ponomarenko Ye. V. Gosudarstvennaya sluzhb (State service), 2019, vol. 21, no. 5, рр. 103–107.
5. Manturov D. V., Nikitin G.S., Os\'makov V. S. Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i munitsipalnogo upravleniya (Issues of state and municipal management), 2017, no. 1. рр. 50–70.
6. Moreva Ye. L., Abdikeyev N. M. Gumanitarnye nauki. Vestnik finansovogo universiteta (Humanities. Financial University Bulletin), 2018, no. 5, рр. 77–83.
7. Morkovkin D. Ye., Nigosyan V. A., Dontsova O. I. Voprosy innovatsionnoy ekonomiki (Issues of innovation economy), 2020, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1911–1928.
8. Rukavitsyn P. M. Vestnik MGLU. Obschestvennye nauki (Bulletin of the Moscow State Linguistic University. Social Sciences), 2020, issue. 4, рp. 98–109.
9. Florida R. Kreativny klass: lyudi, kotoryye menyayut budushcheye: perevod s angliyskogo (Creative class: people who change the future: translation from English). M.: Classic-XXI, 2007,421 p.
10. Chernyshev A. A. Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta (Bulletin of the MGIMO-University), 2015, no. 4, рp. 255–262.
11. Shpolyanskaya A. A. Izvestiya UrGEU (News of the USUE), 2016, no. 3, рp. 106–114.
12. Benderly B. L. Science. 2017, Dec. (Science), 2017, Dec. Available at: https://www.science.org/content/article/fraying-ties-among-academia-industry-and-government-hurt-scientists-and-science (Date access: 18.08.2021). Text: electronic.
13. Perez C. Working Papers in Technology Governance and Economic Dynamics (Working Papers in Technology Governance and Economic Dynamics), 2009, no. 20. 26 p.
14. Singh H. V. Industrial policy and manufacturing: options for international trade policy. Geneva (Industrial policy and manufacturing: options for international trade policy. Geneva), 2016. Available at: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/E15/WEF_New_Industrial_Policy_Manufacturing_report_2015_1401.pdf (Date access: 14.08.2021). Text: electronic.
|
